|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It’s more likely to be an authentic wrong back, usually with the back upside down.
Wrong backs are seen occasionally. If a sheet is run through the press one way and then run through the opposite way, it will get an upside down back of another card, in the parallel slot on the sheet. This is where most wrong backs, certainly not all, come from. Post an image and we can be certain, though. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Huh that's interesting. The back is upside down from the other cards. It didn't even occur to me it could be a real misprint. I hadn't seen any evidence for another similar Larsen wrong back so I just assumed it was a fake.
Pictures of the front and back attached here |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well that is quite unexpected. Thanks for your insight! A few questions if you don't mind.
I don't know anything about how cards were printed in the 50s. How would a sheet accidentally get flipped? And would that mean that all the cards on that one sheet would be misprinted? If this happened more than once would it mean all the Larsen misprints would have the same Seminick back? How rare are 1954 Bowman wrong backs like this? Thanks! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am not quite sure of the press details in 1954, if a feeder machine automated flipping the sheet over or if a human worker sat there and did it over and over all day. Dave might know better and chime in. This happens throughout the entirety of cardboard history - I have an ~1860's CDV that has the front text printed upside down from the lithographers back, and you can still on rare occasion find them today in a fresh pack of Topps. It was even a somewhat frequently recurring issue with 2021 Topps Heritage High Number, as I recall. All the Larsen wrong backs created like this would have a Seminick back, as the wrong back is dictated by being of whatever card is in the exact opposite position on the sheet. Wrong backs are, much less often, created in other ways. For example, a front sheet from a second series paired with a first series back sheet that was laying around the factory, often happening during pre-production testing. 1954 Bowman is not especially prone to this problem, but I have seen others. An exact card found this way, like a 1954 Larsen wrong back, is quite rare. You might look for an exact card with a wrong back and never find it in decades of searching. Please forgive my example of a boxing card, but as this is what I have handy on my hard drive and the 1954 Bowman sheet layout is not fully known, here's an example of how it happens. This Coburn has Gans printed upside down on the back. This happened because the sheet was run upside down. As we know the layout here, we can see that Coburn is in rows 5 and 6 on the left edge of the sheet, so if it was run upside down for the back printing it would be rows 5 and 6 from the opposite right end of the sheet that would be printed on his reverse. Sure enough, that's what happened here. It also illustrates why these are pretty rare - this card is clearly handcut, from a scrapped sheet that wasn't issued because it was caught in quality control. Two mistakes have to be made - a machine or worker has to flip the sheet incorrectly, and then the mistake has to be unnoticed for the card to slip into a pack and be issued. Last edited by G1911; 08-13-2024 at 11:23 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree with Greg 100%. Maybe ToppCat will chime in. Nice card. A number of people collect wrong back cards.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
In case anyone asks, PSA will not grade or authenticate wrong backs unless they are commonly known and are part of an official checklist. 1990 Donruss and 1989 Fleer have a couple of those.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
interesting |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() So, I have looked online for any evidence of another 1954 Bowman Larsen wrong back. This basically means Google--which of course is not comprehensive. Would love to know if anyone here has seen or heard about another one of these out in the wild? Thanks again to this great community! |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| counterfeit 1951 bowman | HootsCards | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-05-2023 09:05 AM |
| FS: 1954 Kaline and 1954 Bowman Yogi Both PSA 6 graded - SOLD | toadkc | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-29-2017 01:15 AM |
| Breaking up 1954 Bowman and 1954 Sets | champaigneappetite | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-30-2013 11:49 PM |
| Preferred method of storing early 50's Topps and Bowman? | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 12-06-2012 08:53 AM |
| 1951 Bowman Counterfeit Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-06-2003 02:36 PM |