 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-07-2025, 05:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
If there one thing I am certain of in this series it’s that we have the correct seven cards in the first column and the last column.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” 
|
|
#2
02-07-2025, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevvy posted this image of Tommy John a short while back - it's Klippstein. You can see a couple small bumps along the bottom edge of the blue, which are consistent with every Klippstein I've seen, and with no other Blues.
|
|
#3
02-07-2025, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 series 6
There was a Miscut posted earlier of wood and he is definitely in column 11
|
|
#4
02-09-2025, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This Bobby Richardson popped today on eBay - by my way of figuring, the gray card below him has to be either McDowell or Banks. The reverse image has absolutely no trace of the adjacent card.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-09-2025 at 05:29 PM.
|
|
#5
02-09-2025, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bob Rodgers is under Bobby Richardson. A lot of these miscuts don't show the color band because the color band wasn't printed aligned with the black border lines. I found a Richardson with yellow above him but I have no doubt it's a red Ferrara with a color separation.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#6
02-09-2025, 06:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is what's holding up the whole layout, Steve Barber has an Indian/Phillie above him that I believe is Phil Linz but every time I get to that point Barber comes out under Lenny Green which can't be right. There is a flaw somewhere in our previous columns.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#7
02-09-2025, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thought I posted this a few days ago - but I think this is certainly Phil Linz over Barber because of the unique properties of the visible black border. This should give us a complete column of (in no particular order) Linz, Barber, Kline, Roznovsky, Coleman, Braves Rookies, Gibbon.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-09-2025 at 07:23 PM.
|
|
#8
02-09-2025, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
02-10-2025, 07:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 series 6
I'm fairly certain that the column cards you posted can't be completely accurate because Linz is below a green banner card.
We have the pattern of Linz-Barber-Rovnovsky-Kline, and the other three you mentioned are in the order of: Gibbon-Braves RS-Coleman. That would force Coleman (Blue banner) to be above Linz, which doesn't seem to match this miscut. I think it is possible, albeit NOT confirmed, that the pattern of Face-Bailey-McDaniel is above Linz. 1966_522_WF-SF.jpg
|
|
#11
07-23-2025, 09:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 .
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#12
02-14-2025, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear God here's another - This image of Belinsky that we've had for some time shows him over a Brave or Angel right?
We have Belinsky in a 6 card column with Blefary, Wyatt, Klippstein, Cannizzaro and John. The card below Belinsky shows white along the top edge, which eliminates Cannizzaro, doesn't it? If so, we know Klippstein has a yellow beneath him. So we now need to add an Angel/Brave AND a Cardinal/Tiger to a partial 6-card column. The math doesn't work.
|
|
#13
02-14-2025, 08:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#14
02-14-2025, 08:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I tentatively have Hal Woodeshick above Dick McAuliffe for a few reasons, it appears to be a yellow card under Woodeshick, the card above McAuliffe needs to be a 3x which Woodeshick is, and that space is currently open. With Stanky being at the top of a column above Bearnarth-G Banks-L Green that means there are mistakes in the other columns so nothing is set.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-14-2025 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Missed a word
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 05:25 PM |
| FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 10:55 PM |
| FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 09:13 PM |
| 1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 08:42 AM |
| 1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 02:09 PM |
Hybrid Mode
