Chris Morales Suing Steve Cyrkin

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

It makes me want to speak out even more!!!

That's why terrorism is so effective. It's the "terror" that makes people stop, think and become scared and worried.

I wouldn't be worried in the least. He can sue all day long. The fact is, MORAL ASS is a complete boob, joke and boil on the MORAL ASS of society. I hope the scum sucking, low lying, bottom feeder gets what's coming to him for perpetrating fraud so long on this hobby.

[sports-rings]

can you image Morales during the discovery phase where lawyers get to ask him questions under oath?

As Barry Bonds found out, not a good idea to lie under oath!

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by sports-rings

can you image Morales during the discovery phase where lawyers get to ask him questions under oath?

As Barry Bonds found out, not a good idea to lie under oath!

Go to the below link:

http://live.autographmagazine.com/pr...g_com_blogpost

[mr2686]

That's too funny. I guess it's going to take judges and lawyers in the hobby to attack the credibility of these "authenticators" before we can get them out of the business. Once they're gone, we can get at the dealers.

[danc]

My favorite part of the testimony is when he admits to using Mark Allen Baker's "Baseball Hall Of Fame Handbook" (or named something like that), even though that book is full of fraudulent examples. Basically ALL of the pre-1900 examples, as if Dan Brouthers and Tim Keefe signed like infants.

So the forger provides him with "those famous signed cuts" that used THAT BOOK to create the examples and he matches it up and it's a go for a certificate? I have authentic exemplars of both, but a man whose job it is to know signatures doesn't? So anyone who has this book can be an authenticator?

DanC

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by danc

My favorite part of the testimony is when he admits to using Mark Allen Baker's "Baseball Hall Of Fame Handbook" (or named something like that), even though that book is full of fraudulent examples. Basically ALL of the pre-1900 examples, as if Dan Brouthers and Tim Keefe signed like infants.

So the forger provides him with "those famous signed cuts" that used THAT BOOK to create the examples and he matches it up and it's a go for a certificate? I have authentic exemplars of both, but a man whose job it is to know signatures doesn't? So anyone who has this book can be an authenticator?

DanC

Well written, Dan. How about the part when he (Morales) was asked by the judge "Did you perform an ink analysis?" and he (Morales) replies "I looked at the ink." Is that how a real "forensic examiner" replies to a question like that!!!??? And some of his exemplars where photographs he took at the Smithsonian!!!??? What the heck....!!!

[drc]

Reading requires looking at the ink.