![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An agreement to step-aside and allow another to win an auction is called collusion and is definitely illegal in that it artificially lowers the price.
I don't think this applies to most of the courtesy withdrawals previously mentioned. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im appreciative of all these well-thought responses to the situation. Im in the gray....
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're doing this w/ a relative, ok. But, if you're approaching basically a stranger and essentially saying, "I'd appreicate it if you didn't bid on this lot becuz I want it more than you do," that's not a question of ethics, but arrogance. Bad form!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, Im more in the middle with guys Ive bought and sold cards with for about a year now. Not a relative, but also not a stranger. The stranger seems like it would fall into that "illegal" category...definitely bad form.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If I choose option 4, is that wrong? Personally, I would never do it, but I HAVE had other collectors approach me (option 5), trying to figure out where I stand on a particular item. I generally try to tactfully brush them off.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do this sometimes and it is not collusion because you cant control the other 100 million people on ebay, but it is a nice gesture between friends in a small collecting niche and even if you get outbid or the price goes for what it normally would anyways, at least you know you and your buddies have each others collecting interests in mind.
To me it is no different than seeing a T206 that is underpriced at a show, but that you might already have but know a friend of yours needs. Instead of buying it and raising the price to your friend, you alert your firend to let them buy it and save them some money. Maybe apples and Oranges but thats how I see it. Last edited by prewarsports; 02-17-2012 at 02:20 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
situation 2 - Actaully a nice thing to do. situation 3 - ok situation 4 - Very not ok. See below. Situation 5 - Hard to tell. I've asked a friend about an item I was interested in and found out how much he'd already bid. Out of my league so I didn't bother bidding, but not as an arrangement, just something I did. I've been asked and have openly told friends my max bid or what I thought of an item. What they decide to do is up to them. The stuff about how #4 can go very wrong- Unlikely anyone would pursue it on an occasional cheap item, but it still shouldn't be done. http://www.jamesmccusker.com/news/article.cfm?id=234 http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/20...apr21a_04.html Steve B |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott - Thank you for the comments. I appreciate that.
![]() I see nothing wrong with giving a fellow board member a "heads up" about a certain card. No need to get into a bidding war with a friend. In the past, I have contacted other board members quite frequently, but not always. I can't let Johnny get all those freak T206s! ![]() Does communication between perspective buyers affect a card's final price? I'm sure it does. Sometimes for the good and sometimes for the bad. In the end, there are alot of other factors involved. Jantz |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about buying a M101-2 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-06-2009 04:21 PM |
Ebay question???? Auction disappeared?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 06-22-2008 08:18 PM |
Question about buying T206s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-04-2007 06:53 PM |
Upcoming Auctions Question ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-03-2007 10:47 PM |
Robert Edward Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-07-2004 12:55 PM |