|
#1351
|
||||
|
||||
That's the spirit! Love the misprints:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#1352
|
||||
|
||||
Any rookie card collectors?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#1353
|
||||
|
||||
1966 Topps Venezuelan.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#1354
|
||||
|
||||
VENEZUELA
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE |
#1355
|
|||
|
|||
I like my multiple Herrera more than my Herrer
|
#1356
|
||||
|
||||
Oops, never mind .
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 09-02-2019 at 01:08 PM. Reason: Messed up |
#1357
|
||||
|
||||
I always suspected that the 1958 Topps Enos Slaughter and Moe Drabowsky cards were side by side on the original uncut sheet because both can be found with a print defect of partially missing black ink on the backs, and it was confirmed by the recently auctioned 1958 second series uncut sheet. There are more than likely #183 Dave Jolly cards out there also affected by the print flaw.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#1358
|
||||
|
||||
The 1958 Topps Mickey Mantle and Jackie Jensen can be found with a printing flaw of partially missing black ink on the back of their cards, with the recently auctioned 1958 Topps second series uncut sheet it is confirmed that they were side by side on the sheet.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 09-02-2019 at 01:20 PM. |
#1359
|
||||
|
||||
Not pre-1980 but it's my favorite (Canseco 40/40 on top):
|
#1360
|
|||
|
|||
Cliff-- appreciate your detective work on those related 58 back defects, and help running them all down. Recurring but pretty scarce.
Jon-- great oddity of an iconic card Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-02-2019 at 03:39 PM. |
#1361
|
||||
|
||||
Awesome card Jon. You must have an amazing Canseco collection.
|
#1362
|
||||
|
||||
An old friend of the variation thread was very gracious to send me a scan of his 58 Topps Dave Jolly print error card that fits in next to the 58 Enos Slaughter print error, now it looks like the card below Jolly, #189 George Susce, is probably affected with the missing black ink print flaw.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#1363
|
|||
|
|||
Great info Cliff
|
#1364
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#1365
|
||||
|
||||
This one is not pre-1980, but I just discovered this in my McGwire box over the weekend. I know for a fact that it is reoccurring because I have 2 of these that are identical. I was just wondering if anybody knew how scarce it is, if at all. I do know that I searched Ebay and COMC and could not find another. Here it is.
|
#1366
|
|||
|
|||
Not a print variation/error. But some kind of inventory label that got on the sheet before cutting, collating and packaging.
|
#1367
|
|||
|
|||
That's a good one sb
|
#1368
|
|||
|
|||
I've never seen anything like that before. It's one of the cooler cards I've seen.
|
#1369
|
|||
|
|||
Topps variations...
I found a few variants from my Topps collection...
A cool 58 Nellie Fox missing the yellow ink... A 74 Stargell also missing yellow ink... And a 94 Stadium Club Ryan no foil... |
#1370
|
|||
|
|||
Another variant...
I also have a blank front 1970-71 Maravich rookie...found in a small collection I picked up a few years ago...
|
#1371
|
||||
|
||||
I love cards like this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. |
#1372
|
||||
|
||||
Hate to be the bearer of bad news but the Fox and Stargel are NOT missing yellow error cards, they are altered. Both of those cards are faded from setting in the sun.
|
#1373
|
||||
|
||||
Always liked the dash lines at the bottom on this one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. |
#1374
|
|||
|
|||
Jon--- I like the Virdon. Do you know who is on the other card ? Calling DDBeat
Dan, following Ben's point take a look at the 63 Kaline thread on the forum page Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-21-2019 at 07:52 AM. |
#1375
|
||||
|
||||
Show...me...your print variations!
Quote:
Thanks Al. I think it’s Mudcat Grant. Added later- Yep it is for sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. Last edited by Jcfowler6; 09-21-2019 at 07:59 AM. |
#1376
|
|||
|
|||
Not quite a printing variation, more of a cutting variation. I don't know enough about how Topps cut their sheets back in the day, so I'm wondering how something like this could happen - anyone know how the sheets were cut up? Were sheets fed into a machine, were blades run through stationary sheets?
I bought this from eBay a few years back - no way it was issued in a pack, so I'm guessing someone took it out of the factory when it was printed in '78. Last edited by deweyinthehall; 09-21-2019 at 05:49 PM. |
#1377
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe Moser could fix it
|
#1378
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#1379
|
|||
|
|||
Really? This isn't just a case where the image is tilted; the piece of cardboard itself is diamond shaped, with no 90 degree angles. These things were in packs? They must have stood out like sore thumbs and most must have come out of the package damaged.
|
#1380
|
|||
|
|||
|
#1381
|
|||
|
|||
|
#1382
|
|||
|
|||
|
#1383
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#1384
|
|||
|
|||
|
#1385
|
||||
|
||||
I have never been able to figure out why they placed cards on the sheet in a random order. Wouldn't it make sense to place the cards on the sheet in number order? Was there a method to it?
|
#1386
|
||||
|
||||
The reason they did that was to have random numbered cards in wax, rack, and cello packs rather than a bunch of consecutive numbered cards in those packs.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#1387
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1. There is masking tape on the front of it. 2. The card is torn about a third of the way through where the tape is. Here are the pictures: I went and took pictures of just my Yankees errors. Not a lot of cards, only six cards in total. Only one is pre-1980, it is this 1976 Jim Hunter: I collect error cards of all sorts, including severly damaged, modified and defaced cards. BUT most of them are post 1980, so should I end up posting them into here, make a thread similar to this in the Modern Baseball cards section, or just make a thread for my own pictures? There is a lot of post 2000 content in this collect, including a lot of hockey cards. |
#1388
|
|||
|
|||
We have had several post 80 variants in this thread but given the length of this thread it might be good to have a post 80 sister thread. Others may think otherwise.
That tape job is interesting. Maybe since the tape was added before insertion in the pack it qualifies as an intentional change to the card and thus a true variation |
#1389
|
|||
|
|||
Finally found one of these
Discussed by George Vrecheck in SCD article https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrE...7zBObuFfOmbJY- |
#1390
|
||||
|
||||
1968 Topps - [Base] #369 - The Sporting News All Star Selection (Carl Yastrzemski) Courtesy of COMC.com Two recurring print defects on this one: 1) Black blemish in left banner 2) Red circle fisheye near B on cap So three variations: regular, one with just black mark, and one with black mark and fisheye.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#1391
|
|||
|
|||
Is 1967 Topps yellow back a thing?
Hi there,
I've been lurking a while and saw something that might be of discussion here. Saw this 1967 Topps Wilhelm card and the back was discolored. Does anyone know if this is fading or weird ink circumstances? I've seen others like this from different series (no apparent pattern), and one card who's back was brownish. I don't know what to make of it. Joel |
#1392
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like the printing process was running low on green ink to me on the 1967 Wilhelm card.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#1393
|
||||
|
||||
I don't have a scan of the back
But it doesn't go with the front.
|
#1394
|
|||
|
|||
The Back ??
Whose names are on the back ? That's very decent for a "two" -- is there a problem we can't see ?
.. |
#1395
|
||||
|
||||
1976 Topps Thurman Munson.
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline). |
#1396
|
|||
|
|||
Miscut
From 1959.. Stan The Man!
|
#1397
|
||||
|
||||
I have a 78 topps Eddie Murray rc with ink dot, anybody else have any info?
Last edited by Elberson; 11-19-2019 at 07:18 PM. |
#1398
|
|||
|
|||
Not baseball, but an unusual 1970-71 Topps B-ball card with partially printed frame line.
|
#1399
|
||||
|
||||
So basically a sister variation to the Jackie Robinson with diamond logo cut off.
There is also a variation of this with white circle to the left of the Phillies ballcap in the diamond logo. I stopped counting when I saw 5 on COMC. 1955 Topps - [Base] #29 - Herm Wehmeier [GOOD] Courtesy of COMC.com
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#1400
|
|||
|
|||
John---here is SCD article on the Robinson and Herm. Note the Herm has a back variation that tracks the truncated front logo. Had not noticed the white mark
https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr9...7QjDQppuh3T3I- Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-16-2019 at 10:57 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |