NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2020, 03:07 PM
Utter Chaos Utter Chaos is offline
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Default A new 1963 Post variation?

Did I discover a new variation? I was checking my 1963 Post cards for Jellos and noticed something with #175 Don Landrum. I have two and one of them seems to have a larger gap between his name and team name.

I googled and could find no mention of any variations with this card (other than a uncorrected error where the player is actually Bob Will). I checked eBay and out of 35 current and sold auctions, 30 have a gap and 5 do not. Is anybody else aware of this?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 94863792_10157990200237900_5856844484041506816_o.jpg (74.0 KB, 150 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2020, 03:18 PM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,916
Default

Are you sure the top one is not a Jello? You conveniently hid the bottom red line and the front card is trimmed so we don't know how long the cards are compared to each other.
But you're right, it does look like a Post variation.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.

Last edited by swarmee; 04-27-2020 at 03:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2020, 03:33 PM
sflayank sflayank is offline
larry s
larry ser.ota
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sunrise fl
Posts: 4,715
Default

2 varieties..good catch
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2020, 03:42 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 2,537
Default

It’s legit, there are a couple of small gap ones on WorthPoint.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2020, 05:13 PM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,986
Default

In my experience, it seems nearly every Post card from 61-63 has some sort of variance depending on which product package it was initially distributed on. Fellow board members Ken Marks and Dan Mabey know each of these variations backwards and forwards....below is an excerpt from a message Ken shared with me a few years back in regards to the number if unique cards in the 61-63 Post sets:

"1962 Post Baseball is by far the toughest set to complete a master set. To be exact, I believe (and think Dan concurs there are 539 different cards (Dan's book originally identified 567 versions, but believe I have convinced him the four six-card panels he shows as Sugar Coated Corn Flakes small boxes do not exist). In the 1961 master set, there are 355 box cards and another 180 company cards in a master set (company cards very easy to tell apart). For 1963 there are 372 different variations of cards. Not saying easy to put together, but the 61 and 63 master sets are much more easy to put together in terms of telling which card might be which."


Obviously a lot of variations within these Post Cereal sets. With the 61 "company" cards, there were 10 cards issued for each of the 16 teams....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2020, 05:24 PM
Utter Chaos Utter Chaos is offline
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee View Post
Are you sure the top one is not a Jello? You conveniently hid the bottom red line and the front card is trimmed so we don't know how long the cards are compared to each other.
But you're right, it does look like a Post variation.
Here's a better photo. I thought the bottom one was a jello because it was shorter but the stars line up and the left stat line is extended so they are both Posts, one is just trimmed more.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1750.jpg (17.8 KB, 132 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2020, 06:12 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 2,537
Default

All of the cards on COMC that are listed as 1963 Jell-O Don Landrum are actually 1963 Post Don Landrum, the Jell-O card has the shorter line on each side of the stats like in the scan, the ones listed as Jell-O on COMC have the longer line that extends further out past the stats. ETA: Apparently someone at COMC was fooled by the unknown variation and believed that the 1963 Post Don Landrum cards with the larger gap are 1963 Jell-O and the 1963 Post Don Landrum with the smaller gap are 1963 Post because that is how they have them listed.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”

Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 04-27-2020 at 06:36 PM. Reason: Addition
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2020, 07:58 AM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is online now
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
All of the cards on COMC that are listed as 1963 Jell-O Don Landrum are actually 1963 Post Don Landrum, the Jell-O card has the shorter line on each side of the stats like in the scan, the ones listed as Jell-O on COMC have the longer line that extends further out past the stats. ETA: Apparently someone at COMC was fooled by the unknown variation and believed that the 1963 Post Don Landrum cards with the larger gap are 1963 Jell-O and the 1963 Post Don Landrum with the smaller gap are 1963 Post because that is how they have them listed.
That's on me -- I'll fix that in a bit. I followed that information but will adjust the 63 Post listings accordingly ASAP

Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2020, 08:08 AM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is online now
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
All of the cards on COMC that are listed as 1963 Jell-O Don Landrum are actually 1963 Post Don Landrum, the Jell-O card has the shorter line on each side of the stats like in the scan, the ones listed as Jell-O on COMC have the longer line that extends further out past the stats. ETA: Apparently someone at COMC was fooled by the unknown variation and believed that the 1963 Post Don Landrum cards with the larger gap are 1963 Jell-O and the 1963 Post Don Landrum with the smaller gap are 1963 Post because that is how they have them listed.
That's on me -- I'll fix that in a bit. I followed that information but will adjust the 63 Post listings accordingly ASAP

They should all be fixed now. I left 2 cards in the Jello area for Landrum as the print was obviously smaller.

Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2020, 06:20 PM
whiteymet whiteymet is offline
Fr3d mcKi3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: whiteymet
Posts: 1,997
Default

The photo on the Jello card also extends farther to the right where it is just above the "B" in batting While the Post Cereal card the photo ends above the "E" in League.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-28-2020, 06:32 PM
whiteymet whiteymet is offline
Fr3d mcKi3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: whiteymet
Posts: 1,997
Default

There are many subtle differences in cropping etc. for these cards depending on which cereal box they were issued on.

In this case Landrum was on a 10 oz. Rice Krinkles box and a 9 oz. Sugar Crisp box.

The card with his team name closer to his name is off of a Rice Krinkles box while the other is from the Sugar Crisp box
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sol Post CEREAL LOT 1961 MARIS 1962 ARRON 1963 MAYS 1963 SNIDER 1963 ROBERTO CLEMENTE megalimey 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 0 01-10-2020 09:16 AM
1963 Topps #173 variation LuckyLarry Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 10-18-2017 11:37 AM
ENDED: 1963 Post Cereal F. Robinson Variation (Stripes on cap): ENDS TONIGHT 8/24 Paul S Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. 0 08-23-2017 02:12 PM
1963 post or 1963 Jello? skelly Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 3 07-18-2013 06:41 AM
1962 Post/1963 Post & Jello FS Archive 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 04-04-2009 05:34 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.


ebay GSB