 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-07-2019, 05:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Question about storing "shiny" cards like '93 Finest Refractors
I like storing cards in binders. I wouldn't mind having a base set of the '93 Finest. That would go in a binder. However, would there be problems with the shiny surface of the refractors sticking to the pocket page?
Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 09-07-2019 at 05:19 PM. 
|
|
#2
09-07-2019, 09:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
They will most likely curl in a binder. You would be better off putting them in a penny sleeve and toploader. Are you really talking about the refractors (thought to be limited to 241 each) or the base set? You mention both. A base set of regular Finest I wouldn't mind in a binder, per se. But I would rather see a complete set of refractors in toploaders.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#3
09-07-2019, 09:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debuting my modern collection, or "shiny blue things" | Bliggity | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 4 | 02-16-2018 02:40 PM |
Linear Mode
