|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: will watson
in your opinion, by era? i guess the easiest way to break it down would be |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Glenn
1. N162 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Paul
N162. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: warshawlaw
photos and photographic images: N173, T204, any Exhibit |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Jerry
1. N162 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Judge Dred
Photographic Images: N172-3, T222, 1940 Playball |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Steve Dawson
N28/N29/N43 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chuck R
Nonsports: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Adam J. Moraine
I prefer Diamond Stars and 1933 Goudey as far as most visually appealing sets. I also LOVE the backgrounds of the N162's. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: tbob
1. N162 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: anonymousdave
N36 amd N135 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: leon
1. 19th Century- Lorillard team cards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: painfullyours
...D304 and 359 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Anson
1.E223 G&Bs although I like the Gypsy Queens (N175) too |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Dan Koteles
though most of us will never get to own one......Boston Garters of 1912 -1913 are awesome. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chris Counts
1. 19th Century — 1888 scraps — When I was kid in the 70s, I found a Sam Thompson and a Deacon White in an antique store. Now they're one of those things I wished I never traded away. Amazing, colorful images. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Julie Vognar
1) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: jay behrens
N42 and N43 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Keith O'Leary
1. N162 Goodwin Champions |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: identify7
Chuck R: could you post scans of |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Daniel McCarthy
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
1. N162 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: ChuckR
Sure, I'll post examples of them...won't be able to get scans up until tomorrow though |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: identify7
Thanks Chuck. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: brian p
19th Century--N162 Goodwin |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chuck R
As requested, I've attached scans of some of my favorite pre-war nonsports sets. Dare Devils are somewhat tough to find. Made by National Chicle, you can probably see some similarities in color and design with the Diamond Stars set. Tootsie Circus cards are scarce, but I love the colors and subjects. The R21 Believe it or Not set by Wolverine Gum (whose only other set was the equally strange and rare Strange True Stories set) have odd designs and stories. The low numbers 1-24 pop up on eBay. The high #s 25-48 are some of the rarest cards of the 30's, sports or nonsports. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Adam J. Baxter
There are so many nice sets, but these are the ones that stand out in my mind. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Bob Rousseau
Obaks, E92s, E95s, N162 Goodwin champions are some of my favorites. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Julie
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chuck R
I could see them fine on this thread a little while ago |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Scott Elkins
Lone Jacks (19th Cent.) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Anson
I don't think the Crofts Cocoas look any better than the E101, E102s, or Dockmans. But they would look better in my collection |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Scott Elkins
regarding the fronts (all the E92's and E101's look the same). However, I was once one of those type card and "back" collectors. So, I have to go by the back as well (and those Croft's Cocoa backs are COOOOOOOOOOOOOL - wouldn't trade one for all the VAM's in the world!). |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chuck R
Can someone verify for me that those nonsports scans I put up yesterday are visible? I'm here at work and can see them fine, but at home yesterday I couldn't view them...I tried two different computers and two browsers (IE and Firefox) and just saw a red "X". I know this isn't that big a deal, but it's the first time I have tried to upload an image and would like to know for future reference. Just in case there is a problem, I've put the pictures on a web page. Here's the link: |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Keith O'Leary
i see em. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Most visually appealing sets
Posted By: Chuck R
Thanks Keith! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FINISH SEVERAL SETS | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 07-20-2008 09:10 PM |
sets started..sets finished...sets discarded | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-09-2007 11:50 AM |
Which Sets Have You Completed And What's Next | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 50 | 10-07-2007 07:12 PM |
Which of these sets should I dabble with? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-26-2007 01:55 PM |
several complete sets and starter sets from 1955 - 1970 available | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 10:14 PM |