|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! The sgc one probably sold for $80, while the PSA sold for $180!
__________________
Nick M |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I know I'm in the minority here, but for me, getting a card slabbed is about authentication and preservation of a wonderful baseball artifact. Cracking open a perfectly good SGC slab and paying to resubmit the card to PSA in hopes that you will get lucky with a more lenient grader, thus changing a card's resale value (notice I don't say "worth") from, say, $500, into one now miraculously worth $800 (just making up these numbers as an example), just seems kind of crazy to me.
Probably some of my view stems from the fact that I collect cards due to a family connection and don't look to make money on them. So as I said, I understand that I am in the minority here. But I always find these discussions bewildering.
__________________
On the lookout for Billy Sullivan Jr. and Sr. memorabilia |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-28-2016 at 06:23 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1965-Topps-2...p2047675.l2557 ... but SGC came out ahead, or rather the better card did. > 293.88 http://www.ebay.com/itm/1965-Topps-P...p2047675.l2557
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My '52 Topps Mantle (SGC 4) didn't meet the requirements for a PSA 4 crossover. $700 down the drain...But...it looks better than most PSA 5s.
That is absolutely at least a PSA 4 per their descriptions: Very Good-Excellent A PSA VG-EX 4 card's corners may be slightly rounded. Surface wear is noticeable but modest. The card may have light scuffing or light scratches. Some original gloss will be retained. Borders may be slightly off-white. A light crease may be visible. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back. They couldn't even tell me why it didn't cross. Spent $700...gave me my card back in SGC holder and didn't even have the courtesy to explain why. Had to call 3 times. If a big customer that spends a lot of money with them submitted it - then I'm sure it's going to cross over. Politics for sure. Shouldn't be that way, but it is. If anything, they are inconsistent snobs...especially when you compare old labels vs the new label harsh standards. Doing a 180 to protect current high graded cards. The current 3s and 4s look better than the older 5s and 6s in many instances. I just want consistency. Last edited by Canofcorn; 07-28-2016 at 12:34 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Wow
Sure looks like a lock for minimum 4 grade. Anything more than a hairline crease on one side? Or paper loss or surface indent? $700. - ouch! I feel for ya.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes ouch! It was cash too, made it hurt that much more. You could've fried an egg on my forehead on the first 10 minutes of the drive home I was so pissed... But I was more mad at myself that I just got hustled and played like an idiot...the kid had no idea why it didn't cross when he gave it back to me and "the head grader already left", he didn't even have any notes to give me. Take my money fine...but at least have the common courtesy to explain why! Brutal. Calling them back and being on hold to find out why it didn't cross made me feel like a bigger idiot, because they already have my money and it didn't cross over, so really it didn't matter. Last edited by Canofcorn; 07-28-2016 at 12:59 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I've found that in general (but not always the case), PSA is more lenient with paper loss and SGC is more lenient with tobacco stains when it comes to T206s in grades GD to EX.
|
Tags |
psa, sgc |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAI grades versus PSA/SGC | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 09-17-2015 01:05 PM |
poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 08:38 PM |
Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 09:47 AM |
original goudeys versus reprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2004 09:09 PM |
1954 SI Versus Reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2002 01:19 PM |