1909 E90-1 Joe Jackson value compared to others

[mrreality68]

Originally Posted by G1911

Yes I know he means rookies, that’s why I asked specifically for “comparable rookies” that sell for more or similar to Jackson but should not. Are we really going to suggest that Jackson rookies belongs above Ruth and Cobb rookies? That would seem to be absurd.

Never said above their value. And should not even be close to those. But the Joe jackson cards IMO are undervalued and over time will catch on and go up. I think they have high upside. Especially as other Joe Jackson cards like the CJ cards and the 1916 Cards get more expensive the rookie card will be another option for them.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by mrreality68

Never said above their value. And should not even be close to those. But the Joe jackson cards IMO are undervalued and over time will catch on and go up. I think they have high upside. Especially as other Joe Jackson cards like the CJ cards and the 1916 Cards get more expensive the rookie card will be another option for them.

So then what are some actual examples of comparable cards the Jackson is undervalued against? Only other Joe Jacksons, that actually portray someone who looks like him?

I'm not saying they don't have upside, most all vintage does. I'm simply asking for any example of the original claim made, that is the subject of the thread post.