|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: warshawlaw
Leaf is known to have made wrong-back cards caused by flipping the sheet before printing. If you were going to checklist the card, would you prefer to do so by the front player's name or the back player's name? Would it make any difference to you if the card is from a numbered issue? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: leon
front |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: Kevin Cummings
I think these items are intended to be picture cards supplemented by written information and not the other way around. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
The Rule of Thumb for identifying such cards has traditionally |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: Todd Schultz
that if a card is a wrong back, it is by corollary a right front, and that listing the card by its right or correct side is proper. I suppose you could call a card a "wrong front", in which case the reverse logic would apply, but that seems silly. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: identify7
Cards which name one player on the front, but show a different player's picture are generally termed to be the designated player's card (not the shown player). However, if the back is also wrong, (what is the chance of it matching the picture?), that could be an interesting collectable - heck, give me one of those three player cards, with the ghost image of another player, as well. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: Glenn
What Todd said. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On a wrong-back card, which player should be the one designated?
Posted By: BlackSoxFan
This is similar to asking: Is the tango eggs weaver indeed a weaver card, a tinker card, or both? I would have to say that as that card was intended to be Weaver...then it's weaver. Much in the same, I feel that cards with various backs should be considered by what's on the front of the card. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bomber's Best w/ wrong back | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 02-28-2008 12:46 PM |
What is the value of a 1958 T wrong back? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-07-2007 02:15 PM |
N48 2 player card....with ad back | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-02-2007 09:57 AM |
What is wrong with the back of this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-12-2006 01:46 PM |
Wrong Back Magee | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-25-2006 01:53 PM |