|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I thought that the 74 Topps Traded set were considered inserts to the 74 Set. I don't consider that part of the regular set.
Many sets included inserts but none are considered part of the regular set. So, if I sell the 1964 Topps set, does that mean I have to include the insert coins as part of the set? i don't think so. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What about 1973 which had team checklists for the high numbers or 1976? I agree, just buy the set and shut him up.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
If I listed a complete 1986 Fleer basketball set and DID not show pictures, nor make mention of the sticker set, the how on earth can a buyer moan and complain if the sticker set didn't come with it?? Same thing with an autographed photo. If I make no mention of the autograph being certified, then you get what you get. Buyers got it easy on Ebay though. They bear zero responsibility.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about selling a near complete 1954 Topps set | ColumbiaComics | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-03-2018 12:09 PM |
What constitutes a perfectly centered T206? | mechanicalman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-26-2015 09:54 AM |
Question about grading complete sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-25-2009 07:31 PM |
Question: I am trying to complete the E-91 set (A,B,C) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-21-2006 03:52 PM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |