|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I recently completed this small subset of 35 cards. Apparently, this small set resulted from ATC transferring their |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
These 35 cards in the Sweet Caporal 150 Factory 649 (overprint) set each have six 150-type backs. This is |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: PatC
Ted, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Indeed, the SC 460 Fac 30 printing of the 55 cards from the 350/460 Series were never issued. These cards were sub- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Red
Under magnification it's 30 that's showing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
THANK YOU......I've searched thru many SC 150 Fac. 649 overprints over the years, looking for what you just posted. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Jim Parker
Ted, can you remind us your explanation of how the plank came to be also available in the 350 series as well? Do you think that ATC pulled it from 150...then thought they had the rights issue resolved, printed some 350s then again pulled it because they realized the rights issue was NOT legally resolved? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
If my theory is correct; and, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence to support it......a "cease and desist" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Jim Thierfelder
I wish I had something to contibute to the thread other than to thank Ted for his very rich, thoughtful, and insightful posts. As great as it would be to solve all the mystery of the monster, it is the mystery that makes the set so fun to collect. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
JIM T....Thanks for your kind words. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Just wondering, are there any more ideas or inputs on this subject, before it disappears ? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Rick McQuillan
Ted, do you have a list available of the 35 known players in this subset? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Here you go guy. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Rick McQuillan
Thanks much! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: barry arnold
Ted, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
That is very, very interesting regarding Heitman allocating a spot for Plank with a Factory 649 back. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sweet Cap (Fac. 30) set-No Wagner, Magie, Doyle & St Lo vars. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-10-2013 01:37 PM |
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED....Sweet Cap 150/fac 649 ovpt subset | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-21-2008 06:00 PM |
T206 Sweet Cap/Hindu/Old Mill Factory 649 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-29-2008 08:24 AM |
4 Well-centered, ungraded T206s Sweet Cap Fac 42 backs For Sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 10-21-2007 09:26 PM |
T206 Hemphill PSA 5 Sweet Cap 150 $105 delivered | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-25-2007 10:05 PM |