|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
i think your right. how about the right edge of #569?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Dagnabbit. I need a mulligan. Dave Nicholson? ETA, on the other two candidates, Cuellar and Mahaffey, the stat lines don't extend far enough. If Nicholson checks out then Bob Allen and the Checklist can be inserted on the bottom row as the last two cards.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 07-10-2021 at 06:56 AM. Reason: Wrrong Nicholson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1966 topps highs
Queen could be in row B (Perranowski) and be above 598 (Perry), 569 (McFarlane), 570 (Mahaffey), 576 (Nicholson) as well as one, as yet unidentified card.
It could also be in row G (Shirley) and be above two, as yet unidentified cards (so 532 is still a possibility, as is Cuellar, Allen, Skowron). And, it is also possible that Queen is in row C (Hoerner) and could be above Sullivan. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cliff-- i believe you have it right on Nicholson !!!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
The matching black blip(s) above "Throws" (which are even more apparent in other Nicholsons I looked at on eBay) and the extended 'year' line (not to mention the matching size of the salmon colored box) are good indicators that DING! DING! DING! we gotta winnah...
1966nicholson576comp.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
That puts Bob Allen and the #517 Checklist in the last two slots on the Bart Shirley/Grant Jackson row. ETA, that also puts Monteagudo and Tebbetts in two of those three consecutive open slots on the Perranoski row, I believe Monteagudo is to the left of Tebbetts if I remember correctly.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 07-10-2021 at 07:21 PM. Reason: Addition |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
All Skowron cards have a stray line from the artwork that goes outside the box. There appears to be a matching stray line on the McFarlane scan but I don't think the scan is good enough to confirm. Maybe JollyElm can do a mashup of the McFarlane miscut and a Greg Morris Skowron card to see if they line up? It would be best for someone to win the McFarlane card and then put it next to a Skowron card and see if it lines up.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
1966 topps highs
This miscut of 552 is currently on ebay. Just a hint of the orange back of a card can be discerned. To me, it matched 566 Cuellar, and if true, then that would put 566 in the spot between McFarlane & Mahaffey, with 532 above McFarlane & 552 above Cuellar. However, my graphics ability is limited, so this would need someone to confirm.
1966_552_edge_back.jpg |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Since the rest of the black is thick and rich, I think the 'Skowron Blip' on the McFarlane card is just an unrelated gray area, or toning or something, so I don't believe it to be a match...
1966SKOWRON590comp02.jpg How funny is it that on the back of Moose's card, although he won multiple championships during more than a decade in the majors, the highlight they chose to include harkened all the way back to his minor league days??
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
JollyElm is right, it’s a stain or a blemish on the McFarlane miscut in almost the exact spot where the stray line is on the Skowron. That means it has to be Cuellar or Gonder but I don’t see any irregularities that would pinpoint a certain card.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Check out the Tebbetts miscut on ebay (shown in post 424). Tebbetts must be above either an unidentified card (528, 566, or 590) or above Mahaffey (570). If Tebbetts is above Cuellar, then that would put 532, Monteaugue, above McFarlane.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
A miscut Cuellar is on eBay, maybe someone can figure out which card is below it. It's not Gaylord Perry because the two stat lines would be showing. ETA, it can't be John Sullivan either, Sullivan has a distinctive bulge on the upper left corner of his salmon stat box, so that means it has to Orlando McFarlane or Art Mahaffey, I believe.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 08-16-2021 at 08:31 AM. Reason: Addition |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
1966 topps highs
Pretty hard to distinguish between whether Cuellar is above 569 (McFarlane), 570 (Mahaffey), or 597 (Sullivan) with just that partial shown. However, the black stats lines on both the McFarlane card and the Sullivan card run closer to the pink background edge than those on the Mahaffey card, so because we see none of the lines in the pink, perhaps it is Mahaffey underneath Cuellar.
In addition, there is a severely diamond cut Cuellar card, so that may mean the Cuellar card is close to an edge. If so, then Cuellar is in the 10 slot, above Mahaffey and with Queen to its right. Then Monteagudo and Tebbetts would occupy the 8th and 9th slot respectively in that same row (Perranowski row). If true, then only Skowron and Gonder require placement. One would be above Perry everywhere in the sheet while the other would be above Sullivan everywhere in the sheet. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1985 Topps Baseball Uncut Sheet w/ Puckett RC * 1987 Uncut Sheets in Box | mintacular | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-20-2017 01:22 PM |
Topps uncut sheets | mybestbretts | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 7 | 11-26-2014 12:30 PM |
1972 Topps uncut partial sheets | SAllen2556 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-07-2014 11:50 AM |
1955 Topps uncut sheets | chadeast | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 06-22-2012 08:52 AM |
1952-60 Uncut Topps Sheets | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-07-2008 02:46 PM |