|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Dennis
I know that the different grading companies appear to grade somewhat differently. Can someon tell me how much degradation occurs in grading for paper loss on the back of a card?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Henry Eshelman
Paper loss will usually take the card to a definite one unless the rest of the card is nice and the paper loss is small in which case you could push a 2. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: barry arnold
We've talked about this one here and there so you may want to do a search. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Josh K.
Here's a good example of what paperloss might do to your grade: |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Josh K.
One more example - the front is not as nice as the Johnson but is not creased or wrinkled and still a solid 4. The paperloss, however, is more severe (going through several layers) and takes the grade all the way down to a 1: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: barry arnold
thanks for the illustrative,corroborative pictures, Josh. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Josh K.
I can sort of understand it with a back like the t206 matty that actually has writing. Its hard to believe it is considered as highly relevant with a blank back card like the Johnson. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Dennis
thank you all for your answers. I read some previous threads to ascertain some better insight on paper loss on backs. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Bob Shannon
My Lajoie has sharp corners and no creases but with paper loss and glue residue on the back the result is the same as the Johnson pictured above. Before grading companies this card would have been considered EX+ condition and the Johnson above would have been NRMT. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Shawn Adkins
This one is a mystery to me. Found it on ebay a couple days ago and saved the scans. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Josh K.
some companies are much more lenient on paperloss than others. Ive found this to be particularly true of GAI. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: tbob
Josh- Funny you mention that, I just received 5 1909 Obaks back from GAI with vgexish fronts and small paper loss and graded 1.5 (fair). GAI hasn't cut me any slack when there is paper loss. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: barry arnold
Bob, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
grading cards
Posted By: Josh K.
Bob, |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STAT now grading cards !!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-18-2008 10:17 PM |
Grading Tobacco Cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-15-2006 12:01 AM |
Grading strip cards and hand cut cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-06-2005 12:16 PM |
grading autographed cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-18-2004 09:58 AM |
Grading of T 206 cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-31-2003 07:03 PM |