|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
You can't see what you don't look for. That is the problem.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
And if you look and still can't see it you, you still can't take off for it.
I might even go as far as to say even IF they did see the before picture, it is STILL graded correctly today.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My guess is that this card has had significant chemical intervention, in which case it is not a "small small" matter as Brent suggests. I hope I am wrong.
And I will go further to say that if he is aware that the card was restored/altered to make a significant difference in its appearance and grade, he is withholding a material fact.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-04-2017 at 09:02 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Here we go again... nothing at all new here... card has been embellished...it is obvious to anyone with decent vision let alone the foremost grading company in the world. The card is over graded it has obvious remnants of what used to be there it is not a seven and should not be a seven. And it seems some people are now on PSA's payroll!!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think he meant you Leon. If he did, I withdraw my approval of that portion of the post.
Last edited by orly57; 02-04-2017 at 09:15 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I think it is great to share differing opinions.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't see how this can be good for the hobby. It has all the appearances of fraud and deception. Heck, even PSA can't figure it out. If someone was doing this to the cards I buy (early 70's PSA 9's), I would be disgusted. BTW, PSA pooffed the thread over there. Someone posted a really nice pair of photos showing both cards side by side. Can someone do that here within the thread? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
And who said SGC cards wouldn't cross to PSA?
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I have no idea, but to just throw out "significant chemical intervention" is a bit reckless in my view. Heck, who knows, maybe distilled water did it.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Water is still a chemical
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Ok, got me there. But most collectors as you well know, in polls done on this board, have not had the same disdain for water as they have for anything else. And I agree with that sentiment.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
According to someone whose opinion I respect highly, the distilled water thing is wishful thinking.
"Your post about the card is essentially correct. It has undoubtedly been submerged in a caustic chemical such as bleach in order to remove the toning and obscure the lighter, untoned areas on the front and back. The type of chemical that has been added has altered the chemical composition of the card and will likely cause the fibers in the cardboard to degrade over time." This person also believes improvement was made to the corners, based on his close examination of the respective scans.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
.
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Peter Spaeth, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, Brian Dwyer, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others Last edited by Neal; 02-09-2017 at 11:14 AM. Reason: . |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I would suspect that they would have to tag it as "altered" if they saw the transformation no? And a 7 with that centering is a stretch in my opinion. I just don't think that I or any of us get a 7 on that card if we sent it in. And why no qualifier on the stain? In this case, the whole card is stained except for the two light areas.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Orlando, too true, and perhaps typifies the eternal conflict between buyer and seller, particularly for an amazing card like the WWG JD RC. Where I get lost in the process is what differentiates what is thought of as harmless touch-ups and what becomes, gulp, restoration. I kinda always believed that if the cardboard remained undisturbed, no trimming, no corner restoration etc., then it was ok to sell as long as it was disclosed the card had been superficially improved. Of course, grading impacts all of that. Who knows?
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
If PWCC had prior knowledge that the card had been improved upon when consigned, then absolutely they should have disclosed such fact in their description. Good call.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Disclosure
As mentioned earlier. I, as the buyer had no idea about this cards past. I purchased a PSA 7 and that's what the card is.
Cards get crossed all the time are all sellers supposed to disclose the former grade and or grading company that graded it? eBay would be overloaded with disclosures if that we're the case. Now I do understand the grade has jumped from a 4-7 but the principle is the same. The bottom line here is regardless of its past it is now in a PSA 7 holder. Last I checked PSA is also the premier grading company. Furthermore, unlike all of you, I have experience purchasing this card, should I go cry to goldin about this? In fact, even if goldin disclosed this issue, I still would have made my purchase. What I got is what I purchased. Psa 7. Last edited by aloondilana; 02-04-2017 at 01:33 PM. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Really? First, which auction houses are reputable? let's start there.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
In a post Mastro world, every auction house should act in an integral manner (not saying they all do) and inform any and all information about cards consigned if they have all the facts disclosed beforehand I am not going to attempt to piggyback on this thread to start on the pros and cons of the various houses except to say I have my favorite, where I do some pretty serious consigning, and that is FTLG. They are pros. No BS. Let's just get the best we can in an ethical manner and make you some money.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Seems to be some messenger killing in this thread. OP made an observation, now there's a great discussion. The only whining I see is the folks that want to sweep this under the rug.
Seller of card already admitted he's a flipper, so I'm sure he knows the risk of buying and selling these types of cards. Comes with that territory, and one of the reasons I don't buy pre-war cards. I don't know enough about them nor what is or isn't acceptable as an alteration. It's clear to me with the lack of review by PSA, it's buyer beware for these cards. The current auction is almost break even for seller. He's smart enough to list with the best auction house in the business. And he's benefiting from the a-hole 3rd underbidder with 10 retractions who is string bidding. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe DiMaggio Type 4 SGC 60 | luxurywines | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-02-2014 03:38 PM |
Does anyone here own a 1936 Joe Dimaggio World Wide Gum rookie? | Zone91 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-23-2014 05:13 PM |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe Dimaggio SGC 30 | majordanby | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-11-2011 08:25 PM |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe Dimaggio SGC 30 | majordanby | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-17-2010 04:38 PM |
DiMaggio Rookie - 107 1936 World Wide Gum Cards on eBay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 06-05-2007 01:06 PM |