|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Hope to get 10-15 8.5s and at least a couple 9s. We'll see. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: David Atkatz
We're all waiting with bated breath, Jim. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
bated breath... whispered humblenesse. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Lee Behrens
Why not send them to SGC and see what they think? Basically a second opinion, that would be alot more interesting. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Scott Levy
who was it that said PSA is going out of business? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Sorry to disappoint you disgruntled professor but I did not go bankrupt. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Steve F
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Fred C
Just out of curiosity, how many of these cards are from the Harris Collection? If they change the grade I assume the label would still reflect the provenance of the card, is that correct? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Matt
Fred - I guess you weren't around here when PSA came out with the half point scale - that policy (only possibility for upgrades) caused some consternation. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: MVSNYC
Fred- Jim has his hands over his Cheerios... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Marc S.
When reholdered, PSA removes the "Harris Collection" designation from the flip. If for not other reason, now that PSA recognizes the advertising back on T206s, there is not enough room for that and the Harris Collection notation. Either way, it is removed. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Good luck, Jim. Keep us posted on how it goes; it will be interesting to see how a potential increase in pops in high-grade T206s impacts the market for those cards. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
I think it's silly they dont downgrade but I understand why purely business, keep guys like Jim happy and wanting to spend money at no risk. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: rand
hey jim, i am glad you made this post, it will be interesting to see how many cards come back at a better grade. i am sure most of the readers on this board do not have the amount of cards to send in for the experiment, and perhaps not the extra funds it takes to pay for 120 cards or so. what is the turn around time for the re-grades? did you keep a record of your own to see what card you thought would get bumped? it will be interesting to see if PSA agrees. no different then when i send my stuff to SGC to see if their opinion is the same as mine. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Anonymous
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: jay wolt
Jim, Good Luck w/ your upgrade quest. Never re-submitted any for bumps |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Ted Sherman
Since my cards really arent worth too much, I crack them and resubmit. So far 2/3 have gone from 7 to 7.5 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
I laugh every time I see that Beyonce commercial..............guess she got paid well to cram that thing in her mouth..............(that's what she said........couldn't resist.......I love The Office..........) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
John, Rand, |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Bruce, |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: sagard
Jim- |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
No screening--just submitted them all--easier that way. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
"Who says I am spending money?" |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
You can e-mail me for more details if you wish--I don't think Joe would be comfortable disclosing our deal in public. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
Nah don't need to bother you Jim I'm sure it's a good deal, best of luck. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
I'm not ashamed --in fact I am delighted with the deal--win/win for me. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
Jim I was only pointing out in my comment above that offering reviews and half grade bumps was smart business on PSA's side especially since theres no chance of downgrade... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Thanks John--same to you--Happy Holidays. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Fred C
I remember the thread about PSA doing half grades (up). I still don't understand the philosophy but hey, if it means .5 up on the label then more power to you. If it gets rid of that Harris label then you're doing even better... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Dan Bretta
So what's the deal with the "Harris label"...Why is it a bad thing? |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
Many of the Harris cards came from the Copeland collection. Its a commonly discussed topic that many dealers trimmed cards to sell to Jim Copeland. Jim was one of the first big wallets in the hobby and had a passion for stellar cards and would pay top dollar. Unfortunately many dealer and sellers took advantage of this trimming cards to sell to him. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimB
Dan, |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Thanks guys...Does anyone know if PSA has ever had to buy back any Harris cards they encapsulated due to trimming? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: John
The 2 above are mine; I have doubts on one I'm an honest guy. When I get time I plan on having all my cards checked by SGC for a second look see. However since I'm not really into the whole graded card thing I havent made it a priority and since these both are in my set since and I'm not looking to sell anytime soon back burner. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
I have only one Harris card in my collection. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Mark McKernon
"Who says I am spending money?" |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Fred C
Wonk, |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
3 bumps to 8.5 out of 118--not so good. So much for arguments big submitters get favoritism. On the positive side, my 3 bumps are all pop ones with none higher --Hartsel, Hinchman and Paskert--so its good to at least have the best of these on the planet which should be pretty good for value. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Fred C
Jim, |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: David Atkatz
" ...its good to at least have the best of these on the planet... " |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Fred, |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Kyle
Hey Jim, |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: dennis
" ...its good to at least have the best of these on the planet... " |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- sounds like PSA gave you a fair and unbiased review as only three cards were bumped. That's good to know. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Kyle, |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JT Burchfield
"earning valuable set registry points for..." |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Peter
Thank you for sharing this information - very interesting project to follow. Congratulations on your great collection. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: JimCrandell
Thanks Peter |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
Congrats JimC..
How close are you to the 8 or greater T206 set? Marty |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review
Posted By: Eric Brehm
Jim C., |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA review question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-01-2007 11:28 PM |
Congrats to the person who submitted a T205 Cobb PSA 9 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-13-2007 07:41 PM |
PSA Review/Set Registry Special | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-17-2006 07:58 PM |
Inside T206 review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-26-2006 08:41 AM |
Vintage PSA Graded Card Review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-10-2006 09:25 AM |