NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

View Poll Results: Which would you rather have?
T206 Red Cobb 1.5 110 68.75%
T206 Red Cobb 4 50 31.25%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2022, 08:35 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 32,797
Default Which Red T206 Cobb Would You Rather Have?

Title says it all. No stipulations...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg t206cobb.jpg (188.9 KB, 449 views)
File Type: jpg red.jpg (180.6 KB, 450 views)
__________________
Leon Luckey

Last edited by Leon; 09-30-2022 at 08:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2022, 08:36 AM
sycks22's Avatar
sycks22 sycks22 is offline
Pete Sycks
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,298
Default

Love Red Cobb's
__________________
My website with current cards

http://syckscards.weebly.com


Always looking for 1938 Goudey's

Last edited by sycks22; 09-30-2022 at 08:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2022, 08:37 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 32,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sycks22 View Post
Any pictures?
Sorry about that. The last thread I had to delete as it wasn't allowing me to add the poll. They are here now.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2022, 08:43 AM
3-2-count's Avatar
3-2-count 3-2-count is offline
T0NY @
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,758
Default

Hi Leon. Id easily choose the 1.5 over the 4, hands down!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2022, 08:51 AM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,951
Default

I like the centering and the corners on the 1.5

I would take either but if I had to choose the 1.5 would be the first choice
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
1917 Boston Store Babe Ruth
Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson
other Joe Jackson playing day cards
1925 Lou Gehrig Rookie Card
1908 Rose Postcard Ty Cobb
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2022, 09:15 AM
RCFire82 RCFire82 is offline
Ryan Cambi⚾️
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 368
Default

Not a fan of the diamond cut...but the 1.5 corners almost look trimmed imho
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2022, 10:36 AM
BCauley's Avatar
BCauley BCauley is offline
Bill Cauley
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 394
Default

I'd go with the 1.5 only because centering is one of the very few things I'm OCD about.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2022, 10:57 AM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is online now
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,513
Default

My centering OCD says 1.5, I couldn't stomach any card in my collection miscut as bad as the 4.
__________________
Phil Lewis
.
E94 27/30
Bender White Cap back run 8/14
Original circulation E98 Master set 120/120

https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2022, 11:00 AM
MVSNYC MVSNYC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,161
Default

I dislike drastic diamond cuts, so I'd vote for the 1.5.

Last edited by MVSNYC; 09-30-2022 at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2022, 11:08 AM
ClementeFanOh ClementeFanOh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 713
Default Which Cobb

The 1.5- Trent King
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-30-2022, 11:17 AM
HOF Auto Rookies's Avatar
HOF Auto Rookies HOF Auto Rookies is offline
Brent Niederman
Bre.nt Nieder.m@n
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,539
Default

Oh wow, that 1 all day. Presentation and centering is incredible.
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2022, 11:27 AM
BobbyStrawberry's Avatar
BobbyStrawberry BobbyStrawberry is offline
♏︎t✝️ℌǝɯ ♓︎ℊℌ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
Default

1.5 for me without question.
__________________
_
⚾️ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2022, 12:55 PM
raulus raulus is offline
Nicol0 Pin.oli
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
I think it's the spider wrinkles you mention.
.
Interesting. Not that my vote matters much, but I might be inclined to select none of the above.

I mean, they both have their flaws, and I guess its a question of whether those are flaws that you can live with. I would be inclined to keep looking to find another piece that didnt have these specific flaws. I would be hopeful that a PSA 4 could be found with better centering and less tilt.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left:

1959 Bazooka Complete Box
M118 (PSA calls it 1963 Baseball Magazine)
1968 American Oil left side
1971 Bazooka numbered
1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:04 PM
Johnny T's Avatar
Johnny T Johnny T is offline
John T
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: NJ
Posts: 32
Default

Give me the 4...I'll sell it, but the 1.5 (which I like better anyway) and pocket the difference!!! JT
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:06 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 32,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny T View Post
Give me the 4...I'll sell it, but the 1.5 (which I like better anyway) and pocket the difference!!! JT
The next question could be what is the difference in cost between the 2? It might not be a huge gap at the end of the day....and it might be
.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:05 PM
Aaron Seefeldt's Avatar
Aaron Seefeldt Aaron Seefeldt is offline
Aaron Seefeldt
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Suburb of Chicago
Posts: 245
Default

Hi Leon,
I can't vote without knowing the conditions of both cards. So many people are getting trained to buy 3 dimensional objects based on how they look on their iPhones or laptops. Call me old school but I'd like to know why the 1.5 is graded a 1.5? Obviously it has some defects. Are there hidden creases that don't show up on the 2 dimensional picture? Is there paper missing somewhere?

Same with the PSA 4. Does it have a hidden crease?

We always say buy the card, not the slab... how about we buy the card based on the actual card, not how it looks on our screens?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:09 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 32,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Seefeldt View Post
Hi Leon,
I can't vote without knowing the conditions of both cards. So many people are getting trained to buy 3 dimensional objects based on how they look on their iPhones or laptops. Call me old school but I'd like to know why the 1.5 is graded a 1.5? Obviously it has some defects. Are there hidden creases that don't show up on the 2 dimensional picture? Is there paper missing somewhere?

Same with the PSA 4. Does it have a hidden crease?

We always say buy the card, not the slab... how about we buy the card based on the actual card, not how it looks on our screens?
Hi Aaron
As far as I can tell, the condition issues are the ones that can be seen on the screen. I just grabbed the scan of the 4 from eBay, so don't know of hidden defects on it. The 1.5 has those spider wrinkles. The back could be discolored but I am not sure. So the answer is, I don't think there are hidden defects.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:14 PM
Aaron Seefeldt's Avatar
Aaron Seefeldt Aaron Seefeldt is offline
Aaron Seefeldt
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Suburb of Chicago
Posts: 245
Default

thanks for the description. If the prices aren't too far apart, I'd take the 4
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:41 PM
ValKehl's Avatar
ValKehl ValKehl is offline
Val Kehl
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Manassas, VA (DC suburb)
Posts: 3,071
Default

Others have already commented on the spider wrinkles in the red background of the 1.5. These wrinkles are what my eyes immediately noticed when I first saw this card, and they bother me so much that I don't enjoy looking at this card. I do somewhat enjoy looking at the 4, despite its obvious flaws.
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), E220 National Caramel with Type 2 & Type 3 backs, 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, W575-1 E. S. Rice version, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad back, etc. Also T216 Kotton "NGO" of Hugh Jennings. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking of WaJo.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-01-2022, 01:29 AM
babraham babraham is offline
Brian
Bri@n Abra.ham
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: AZ
Posts: 362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Seefeldt View Post
Same with the PSA 4. Does it have a hidden crease?
It does not.

I should know, as that is my PSA 4...well, was my PSA 4...haha, I just sold it today on ebay.
It certainly has a centering issue along with the diamond cut. Which is the main reason I never even bothered to list it on the BST here.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-01-2022, 09:14 AM
MVSNYC MVSNYC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,161
Default

One or two people above said they thought the 1.5 looked short; I actually don't think it's trimmed. First, it has a very subtle diamond cut (obviously not as drastic as the 4), but the angle of the top border echoes the bottom. Also, as we know there was a wide range of sizes that came out of the factory, due to the way they were cut. So I think it's legit, and would be my choice over the 4...And, FWIW, over the years, I've noticed that many Red Cobbs tend to often look a little shorter than other cards (not trimmed, but "factory short"), but they rarely have large borders like some other T206 cards. Maybe because there's so many of them, we see such a wide range of sizes, not sure.

Last edited by MVSNYC; 10-01-2022 at 09:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-01-2022, 10:16 AM
Pat R's Avatar
Pat R Pat R is offline
P@trick R.omolo
member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MVSNYC View Post
One or two people above said they thought the 1.5 looked short; I actually don't think it's trimmed. First, it has a very subtle diamond cut (obviously not as drastic as the 4), but the angle of the top border echoes the bottom. Also, as we know there was a wide range of sizes that came out of the factory, due to the way they were cut. So I think it's legit, and would be my choice over the 4...And, FWIW, over the years, I've noticed that many Red Cobbs tend to often look a little shorter than other cards (not trimmed, but "factory short"), but they rarely have large borders like some other T206 cards. Maybe because there's so many of them, we see such a wide range of sizes, not sure.
I agree with you Michael and it doesn't look that short maybe a 1/16 shorter than the average T206.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:07 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,794
Default

I would select neither too if that was an option. If forced to pick, I would take the 4. The spider wrinkles would bother me more than the centering.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:43 PM
NYYFan63's Avatar
NYYFan63 NYYFan63 is offline
Ro.b Gui.1fo.y1e
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 676
Default

1.5


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-30-2022, 03:18 PM
luciobar1980's Avatar
luciobar1980 luciobar1980 is offline
Lucio Barbarino
Lu.cio Barb.arino
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 995
Default

Disregarding value, this is a tough call. I generally prefer factory defects to damage, and I particularly love that super solid red background of the 4, but the 1.5 presents better at first glance. i'd probably take the 4 but that could change seeing them in person.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-30-2022, 03:24 PM
refz's Avatar
refz refz is online now
Danny Gr|mes
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waterbury, Conn.
Posts: 404
Default

Without a doubt the 1.5
__________________
Successful Transactions:
Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911
(Im sure Im missing some quality members)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-30-2022, 03:27 PM
Dead-Ball-Hitter's Avatar
Dead-Ball-Hitter Dead-Ball-Hitter is offline
J@E R1T0
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Scenic Massachusetts
Posts: 323
Default

i agree the 1.5 is extremely nice for the grade, but given the clean surface, strong color, and relatively sharp corners, I'd easily prefer the PSA 4. I value the former more than centering.
__________________
Thanks for your thoughts, Joe.

Love the late 1800s Boston Beaneaters and the early Boston Red Sox (1903-1918)!

Also collecting any and all basketball memorabilia.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-30-2022, 03:46 PM
BeanTown's Avatar
BeanTown BeanTown is offline
Jay Cee
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,788
Default

Baseball cards Centering Centering Centering!!!!!

Real Estate location location location!!!!

Brady Bunch Marsha Marsha Marsha!!!!!!
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-30-2022, 07:10 PM
Steve D's Avatar
Steve D Steve D is offline
5t3v3...D4.w50n
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,790
Default

Honestly, I don't like either one of them. The 4 is too OC and the 1.5 just looks trimmed on the top/bottom.

I'd pass on both, and keep looking.

Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce.

Current Wantlist:
1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back)
1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-01-2022, 12:29 PM
puckpaul puckpaul is offline
P.aul Orl,in
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead-Ball-Hitter View Post
i agree the 1.5 is extremely nice for the grade, but given the clean surface, strong color, and relatively sharp corners, I'd easily prefer the PSA 4. I value the former more than centering.
+1, easily the color and sharpness of the 4 are superior for me.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-01-2022, 12:43 PM
brob28's Avatar
brob28 brob28 is offline
Bi11..R0berts
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,126
Default

I'd opt for the 1.5 mainly due to centering.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T206 REFERENCE, Reflections, VOL II......Reprising the Ty Cobb / TY COBB card debate tedzan Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 32 06-14-2019 08:29 PM
2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 29 03-13-2002 06:40 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 AM.


ebay GSB