![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As seen here.. we have the very popular 1922 Babe Ruth Bain photo in its conventional 5" x 7" size. BUT we also have this Charles Conlon image that is exactly the same. It's trimmed down from it's possible size of 6.5" x 8.5" which is much bigger than the Bain and there's more image to be seen. The Bain photo is much more grainer. Is the Bain photo a Type 3? As seen, you can clearly see the the Conlon photo is much sharper without any negative imperfections. Both are certified "Type 1" photos. Curious if anyone has any input on this.
All the best! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like a Conlon copied by Bain. Bain should be a type 3.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress). https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy Other interests/sets/collectibles. https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums My for sale or trade photobucket album https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
regardless great photos and great observation
sadly I have no experience with photos but will be interested in the answer
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth 1917 Boston Store Babe Ruth Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson other Joe Jackson playing day cards 1925 Lou Gehrig Rookie Card 1908 Rose Postcard Ty Cobb |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It appears that way.. if he used this photo from Conlon my questioned would be, did he use other images from other sources? His images are usually grainy and not the best quality in my opinion.
Thanks for your input mark. Albert |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|