|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Just my 2 cents for what's it's worth...
I think responsible people who are knowledgable in a high risk signature would be hesitant to comment on an image as small as this one. This would be adequate for an item that was obviously bad, but in the instance of a potential skilled forgery, you need a giant high res image that shows fine detail before you can have any confidence in offering an opinion. At arm's length it may look fine, but one closeup it may show subtle signs of hesitation, ink blobbing, etc. On this example, what is going on on the tops of the "ere" in "Sincerely?" Are those slow downs? Can't tell based on this photo.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinion on ruth | JustinD | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 09-15-2016 07:47 AM |
Ruth Opinion ? | kaddyshack | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 12-16-2015 07:25 AM |
Ruth Auto Opinion | Kco | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 03-15-2015 11:39 PM |
Opinion on this Ruth | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 24 | 12-23-2014 09:13 AM | |
Ruth Sig...opinion | jboosted92 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 02-21-2012 06:53 AM |