|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
T205 SGC Power Rating
Posted By: Frank
I just recently started working on the T205 set and have found it to be an enjoyable experience. I know that this will be a long work in progress and I get most of my knowledge from the experts on this board. Everyone is pretty much in agreement that the Hoblitzell (no stats) is definitely the most difficult card to find/obtain without taking out a second mortgage. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
T205 SGC Power Rating
Posted By: Misunderestimated
I think the "power rating" (SGC Registry) or "weight" (PSA Registry) given a card in a set registry is its relative value, which encompasses both its scarcity and the demand for the card. Thus, Cobb or Matty who are not scarce are given considerable relative "power" or "weight" as are scarce cards in the T205 set such as Rowan, Suggs, or Grant, who are considered stars. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
T205 SGC Power Rating
Posted By: Jason
The power ratings are a little strange in some regards. I think the rarest Bobby Wallace should be given more weight as well. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E98 power ranking according to SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-16-2007 04:54 AM |
The Power Of The Forum | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-18-2007 09:25 AM |
The Power of this Forum? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-30-2007 04:05 PM |
Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |
Power Sellers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 03-05-2003 11:21 PM |