|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I don't love it, the formation of letters all seem off, additionally, to me, it looks as if the pen was lifted and restarted in a few spots in Mickey. If it is in fact genuine it strikes me as a very rushed example and I'd probably pass on it.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I like it. A bit older than most Mantle signatures you see in my opinion.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed. I like it too.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Very good.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Looks OK to me
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Authentic
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The signature is text book. From the dropped ink at the first M to where he slightly picks the pen up to join the "i"... to the perfectly structured "ckey". Interaction from the "M" to the "a" is perfect. Speed and shape of the "a" is perfect. The pointy "n" and perfect "tle" on the downward angle. I'd like to see the entire photo, but it's a 9/10 on Fudd's 10 point must system for Mantle signatures. A Mantle forgery almost never looks rushed. Just pathetic in the attempt. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What he said
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Great auto
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'll take my licks on this one |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Also. The signature is in pen, which I love. You see sharpie 90% of the time, so these are nice to see. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I hate Sharpie! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mantle Opinion | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 13 | 10-08-2014 05:35 PM |
Mantle opinion | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 11 | 03-08-2014 06:45 PM |
Another Mantle opinion | mravk | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 09-29-2013 08:39 PM |
Mantle opinion , please | dogmechanic | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 08-08-2013 09:21 AM |
Another Mantle opinion | Rays & Mariners | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 12 | 04-14-2013 01:05 PM |