|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Grading a card with an ink transfer
I've read about wet sheet transfers, but I have a card in which the back has an ink transfer from something else (post factory). Would PSA give this a MK qualifier similar to a stamp? Or could it escape the qualifier fate altogether and live a happy life as a normal PSA 1? Thanks.
Last edited by scmavl; 04-04-2021 at 10:59 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Any thoughts, folks? Thanks.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
It is supposed to get the MK qualifier, but any qualifier on a PSA 1 does not hurt it in registry terms. It would still be worth a 1 on the registry.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with John (should) get the qualifier. How does the front look?
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, guys. I'm not a registry person but I really don't like qualifiers. I may just go SGC then. The front looks like a decent PSA 1. Well creased, but still has decent eye appeal for a low grade Ruth.
Last edited by scmavl; 04-04-2021 at 11:00 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Wet Sheet Transfer vs. Impression Cylinder Transfer | Sean | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-31-2020 01:40 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |