NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on Ebay
Pre-WWII Cards
Post WWII Cards
Vintage Memorabilia
Babe Ruth Cards
Ty Cobb Cards
Lou Gehrig Cards
Mickey Mantle Cards
Goudey Cards
Bowman Cards
T205s on Ebay
Tobacco "T" Cards
Caramel "E" Cards
Vintage Baseball Postcards
Football Cards on Ebay
Exhibit Cards
Strip Cards
Baking Cards
Sporting News
Playball Cards on Ebay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2019, 07:11 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is online now
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,612
Default Has a Set Grown on You Over Time?

I know the title of this thread seems to be asking if you've had some sort of cardboard borne malady overcome you, but I digress.

For the longest time, I had always hated the 1960 Topps set. Its crowded, horizontal design was a nightmare, virtually all of the player photos were dreaded headshots, the rookies had the terrible circle design of the 1959 set, and the manager cards didn't fit into it at all. They looked like they were stolen from some other never-produced set and just thrown into the mix...but then something very enlightening happened. When Bobby was organizing one of his PSA group submissions, I started flipping through my 1960 album to see if I had anything worthwhile (ended up getting a PSA 8 Whitey Ford, a PSA 4.5 Yaz RC, a PSA 8 Gene Conley variation and a PSA 5 Mantle), and I kept flipping, and then going back and forth really looking at the players and BOOM!!!!!!! I suddenly realized that I actually loved this set. Headshots always bother me terribly, but these are coupled with the (often weirdly cropped) inset photos, so there's an oddly comforting portrait quality to them. Sort of like your mom getting professional family photos from Sears back in the day. Plus, a huge number of these pictures were taken inside the old, magnificent stadiums. The crowds are very sparse (obviously due to the pics being taken during warm-ups), so you see the structures themselves and not just a muddy sea of blurry faces in the background. Since the sky isn't prominent in too many shots, it really brings the viewer right into the ballpark itself. I find that fascinating. And the color treatments of the cards - the backgrounds of the inset photos paired with the alternating hued letters of the player names - along with the cool logo placement, creates a real dynamic look and feel to the cards. I frickin' love them!!!!

Here's a bunch of random screengrabs from ebay...

s-l1600-5.jpgs-l1600-2.jpg

s-l1600-3.jpgs-l1600-4.jpg

s-l1600.jpgs-l1600-6.jpg

s-l1600-7.jpgs-l1600-8.jpg

Has any set you formerly hated ever grown on you to the point that you really enjoy seeing the cards now? If so, give the initial reasons for the hate, and (not to sound too much like a hippie) the reasons for your newfound love.
__________________
Check out my bucket(s). Virtually everything is available for trade:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706
http://s1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee404/JollyElm/
http://s1036.photobucket.com/user/elmjack44/library/

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980's.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2019, 08:57 PM
CobbSpikedMe's Avatar
CobbSpikedMe CobbSpikedMe is offline
Andy H.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belle Mead, NJ
Posts: 1,505
Default

I always used to hate the 1954 Bowman set. I don't know why but I think part of it had to do with the fact that I used to only see examples of the cards in mail order catalogs with black and white photos and they always looked terrible. Then one of my OBC buddies sent me my first ever actual 1954 Bowman cards and I fell in love with them right away when I had them in hand. The colors are awesome for some reason. And the images are cool too. I remember one of the first ones I had was Jim Gilliam and I just thought it was an amazing looking card in person. I've been slowly working on the set ever since and always get excited when I pick up a new one.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar.

The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here
My Online Trading Site: Click Here
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
My Humble Blog: Click Here
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2019, 09:17 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 8,059
Default

Most definitely. 1952 Topps. I never really cared for it; I was a 1954 guy. I grew to appreciate it over time. Unfortunately, I came to appreciate it too late in the game to get a Mantle card.

There are probably more sets I've come to dislike over time, like 1975 Topps, which annoys the heck out of me. I mean, they couldn't even make all the players from each time the same colors.
__________________
Please visit my web site: www.americasgreatboxingcards.com
Judge a man by how he treats someone who can do nothing for him--Nick Charles
God is not on our side because He hates idiots--The Good
I've had a lovely time, but this wasn't it--Groucho

Last edited by Exhibitman; 07-06-2019 at 09:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2019, 09:32 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,251
Default

52 Topps definitely.
__________________
Stuff trumps all. Even tainted stuff.

"...we don't believe that there is anything of a material nature for our company to be concerned with." -- Joseph J. Orlando
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2019, 09:49 PM
wdwfan wdwfan is offline
Emlily Ell.is
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,294
Default

I've always hated the oversized sets. I'm very CDO, and I don't like the way they look in toploaders. But today I picked up a couple of 56s, and I bought 2 54s earlier this week. So they're starting to grow on me.

I like the sets because they're not as big as something from the late 1950s, early 1960s. I think it'll be a bit easier to build these larger sets. Now if there were only a way to store them in pages. They don't fit in the 9 pockets, and you can't use regular toploaders because you can't use a penny sleeve. So not sure how to store them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-06-2019, 10:31 PM
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear PolarBear is offline
Don
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 632
Default

I had to think through this for awhile but ultimately, I still like what I originally liked. Nothing really grew on me. I can see why you hated the 60 set though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2019, 08:49 AM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 1,727
Default

For me, '72 Topps. When I first started collecting they were only 14 years old, and I remember thinking they were overdone and gaudy. Of course this was before any sense of nostalgia for the 70's had developed. I remember having the Clemente base card as a kid and thinking that was cool, but moreso for the picture than the design.

Fast forward 30+ years and I think they are incredible. Rarely has a set captured an era so well (honorable mention to '59 Topps...) and the color and variety of these cards now strikes me as beautiful over gaudy. The Yaz, McCovey, Ryan, Carew, and Carlton Traded cards are my favs. I am going after the whole set, but have just started - have maybe close to 75 cards out of the monster 787.
__________________
Postwar stars / HOF'ers. Slowly working on 1958 and 1972 Topps sets.

Last edited by jchcollins; 07-07-2019 at 08:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-07-2019, 10:00 AM
bb66 bb66 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 29
Default

My buying cards years as a child were 64-68.My favorite set was 1965 and least liked was easily 1964.However I have grown to like those 64's a lot.
I have completed in near mint raw the 1965 & 1966 sets. Working on the high number 1967's(tough). I will finish 1964 after the 67's.
I love the look of the 1963 & 1960 sets.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-07-2019, 06:46 PM
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear PolarBear is offline
Don
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 632
Default

72 Topps, while I agree it captures the 70's era feel, always reminds me of a theater marquee.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-08-2019, 06:46 AM
Jim65's Avatar
Jim65 Jim65 is offline
Jam.es Braci.liano
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wdwfan View Post
I've always hated the oversized sets. I'm very CDO, and I don't like the way they look in toploaders. But today I picked up a couple of 56s, and I bought 2 54s earlier this week. So they're starting to grow on me.

I like the sets because they're not as big as something from the late 1950s, early 1960s. I think it'll be a bit easier to build these larger sets. Now if there were only a way to store them in pages. They don't fit in the 9 pockets, and you can't use regular toploaders because you can't use a penny sleeve. So not sure how to store them.
They make 8 pocket pages that fit the 1952-56 Topps cards.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-08-2019, 06:59 AM
Vintagevault13's Avatar
Vintagevault13 Vintagevault13 is offline
€d M!££w00D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wdwfan View Post
I've always hated the oversized sets. I'm very CDO, and I don't like the way they look in toploaders. But today I picked up a couple of 56s, and I bought 2 54s earlier this week. So they're starting to grow on me.



I like the sets because they're not as big as something from the late 1950s, early 1960s. I think it'll be a bit easier to build these larger sets. Now if there were only a way to store them in pages. They don't fit in the 9 pockets, and you can't use regular toploaders because you can't use a penny sleeve. So not sure how to store them.


Ultra Pro makes makes vintage toploaders/sleeves for 52-56 Topps if you want to go that route.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting

Ed

Complete:

1972 Topps Baseball
1973 Topps Baseball
1974 Topps Baseball (master set w/all variations)
1975 Topps Baseball

In progress:

1971 Topps Baseball
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-08-2019, 12:30 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 1,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear View Post
72 Topps, while I agree it captures the 70's era feel, always reminds me of a theater marquee.





Very interesting. Topps’ main office was still in Brooklyn then I think - I wonder if any theater or theateres nearby inspired that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars / HOF'ers. Slowly working on 1958 and 1972 Topps sets.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-08-2019, 02:24 PM
Puckettfan Puckettfan is offline
Kris
member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 138
Default 55 Bowman

For me it is 1955 Bowman. I used to think it was horribly kitschy and ugly. The whole TV-set motif was just did not do it for me. However, over the years this set has really grown on me. I think it comes from an appreciation for the "period piece" nature of the set. I like that Bowman used the combination of the national past time and newest technology as a last ditch effort to fend of Topps. I have grown to appreciate the umpire cards and it is cool to see all those players in Shibe Park.
__________________
Successful transactions with members: Hammerin'Hank, ghostmarcelle, 53Browns, deepstep19, wolfdogg, robw1959, dealme

https://www.collectorfocus.com/colle.../my-collection
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-08-2019, 02:57 PM
wdwfan wdwfan is offline
Emlily Ell.is
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,294
Default

Thanks for the heads up. I will have to check them out. Do they go horizontal (I'm assuming so) vs. vertical? I really like the vertical pages. I asked my LCS about these pages on Saturday, and they didn't know what I was talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim65 View Post
They make 8 pocket pages that fit the 1952-56 Topps cards.

I will check these out too. Will they still fit into a 2-row shoebox? That is how I have my vintage stored at this point, and it's separated by year. As long as they still fit into that 2-row, I might give them a try.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vintagevault13 View Post
Ultra Pro makes makes vintage toploaders/sleeves for 52-56 Topps if you want to go that route.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-12-2019, 07:50 PM
cubman1941 cubman1941 is offline
Jim Boushley
Jim Bou.shley
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Kingsport Tennessee
Posts: 741
Default

I agree with the 52 Topps. i hated them when they first came out so ignored them. Started on the 53's and 54's then life got in the way and when I returned my mother had tossed all my cards out. Restarted again in 76 but still didn't like the 52's and passed on all except my Cubs. Monday morning quarterbacking is great but if I had only got all those 52's when I had the chance and all the others I passed on because I was a "Cub" collector.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-13-2019, 05:01 AM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 655
Default

For me, I’ve had it go both ways. I used to not like the 1965 or 1966, but they have grown on me over time. Still not my favorites, but I like them a lot more now. OTOH, the 1961s and 1967s I’ve really cooled on over the years. In the former, I don’t like the photography as much as I used to, and the latter just looks like a low-effort ripoff of the 1957 design. And the facsimile signatures look bad on autographed cards.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 258/274 (94.16 %)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-13-2019, 06:19 AM
BillP BillP is offline
Bill par.sons
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 167
Default

My preferences have always been away from horizontal cards. So those years remain in the background. For this question it's 1964 all the way for me. I really ignored this year as I was partial to 62 63 66 67. But lately I really come around to it. I like cards with a not of colors in the scheme. Although the format is somewhat plain, I like the shots in this set more than some others. For me in collecting this set was the price of the clemente card. Why so high? Seems like this particular year is more popular than most. Although not a rose fan, I do like this year of him 2nd to the 65. The mantle is decent but tougher to find focused. 2nd would be 58, and I know theres a lot of talk about blandness headshots of this set, but I came back around to it lately as well. At least most cards are headshots and there consistant. Saying all this though. My top 5 continue to be: 67 66 63 54 62 In that order.

cheers, billp
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-13-2019, 01:19 PM
Mark70Z's Avatar
Mark70Z Mark70Z is online now
M@rk Comer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,325
Default Topps

When I was young there were two years in particular that I didn’t really like the look and that was ‘62 and the ‘68 set. I wasn’t fond of brown nor did I enjoy burlap (or whatever that is). I know a lot of you are set collector’s and I liked collecting all the cards back in the day, but focused mainly on the Oriole players. While I have some cards still I focus on Brooks Robinson cards pretty much exclusively nowadays. I now like the look of all the vintage Topps sets including the ‘62 and ‘68. Probably my favorite ‘62 is the Brooksie AS card and I can’t pick a favorite ‘68 since the regular issue Topps card is cool, but then you have the Milton Bradley and the Venz as well.

To me it’s so strange that some of the sets you guys don’t like I love the look. Can’t see how someone couldn’t enjoy the looks of the ‘72 and ‘75; some of my favs.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-13-2019, 04:10 PM
ALBB ALBB is offline
Albert Bee
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 384
Default sets

used to think 63 Fleer set was - lame,boring,dull...but kind of look at it different now..not too much different..but a little better
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-13-2019, 04:41 PM
55koufax 55koufax is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 50
Default 63 fleer

Like many Topps sets ('69, '74. '77. '78, etc) simplicity rules!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-16-2019, 05:30 AM
SAllen2556's Avatar
SAllen2556 SAllen2556 is offline
Scott
Scott All.en
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Detroit
Posts: 440
Default

72's are groovy! I always assumed the boys who created the '72 set were Deadheads at heart.

For me, I hated the '71 set. Black, ugly, with only one year's stats on the back. And, honestly, I still hate 'em overall, but if they're centered and the corners aren't worn, some of 'em are ok. The Ryan and Munson cards aren't bad.

2538366f.jpggrateful_dead_45.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-20-2020, 04:17 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is online now
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,612
Default

This is an old thread, but I see a lot of renewed discussions of Topps sets from the 70's, so maybe it's time to revive it...

Has a set grown on you over time?
__________________
Check out my bucket(s). Virtually everything is available for trade:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706
http://s1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee404/JollyElm/
http://s1036.photobucket.com/user/elmjack44/library/

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980's.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-20-2020, 06:49 PM
obcbeatle's Avatar
obcbeatle obcbeatle is offline
Jerry
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 217
Default

1962 Topps, at first wasn't sure about the "woodies", but now I really dig em :-) 1973 Topps, some really nice action shots that I didn't appreciate at first.
__________________
Collecting: Anything Larry Doyle (my great, great Uncle), Pre-War/Post-War Giants & Post-War Braves. My Wantlist

Selling: Cards and memorabilia I'm weaning from my collection to fund other collecting interests.
https://www.ebay.com/str/recollectionantiques/

Last edited by obcbeatle; 05-20-2020 at 06:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-21-2020, 10:33 AM
Phil68's Avatar
Phil68 Phil68 is offline
Phil Apostle
Ph,il Ap0stle
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Midwest
Posts: 505
Default

Baseball-wise, so many have grown...others have fizzled...
The '62 Topps, '55 Bowman, '55 Topps, '60 Topps have grown on me quite a bit over the years.
Among the fizzlers would be '53 Topps. I built this set twice, so it may just be over loved? I used to be nuts for late 70's stuff...that kinda fizzled, too.
The rest of the sets I've always disliked remain disliked
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-21-2020, 10:48 AM
Tere1071 Tere1071 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb66 View Post
My buying cards years as a child were 64-68.My favorite set was 1965 and least liked was easily 1964.However I have grown to like those 64's a lot.
I have completed in near mint raw the 1965 & 1966 sets. Working on the high number 1967's(tough). I will finish 1964 after the 67's.
I love the look of the 1963 & 1960 sets.

In the 70s I had maybe about 200 each of the 64 and 65 sets. The 64 set was ho-hum while the 65 set seemed more dynamic with its pennant. After collecting the Heritage version of each my opinion has changed, I enjoy the simplicity of the 64 design. I find that the image stands out more boldly than that of the 65 design. I'm not knocking the 65 design, it's nice, but I've grown to like the 64 version more.

One set that I did like as a kid was the 72 Topps, I bought the cards from the packs, but I was never able to complete it. It still has its appeal, but I no longer would need to have that design as part of my collection. Likewise the glossy version of cards that became popular in the 80s, Topps Tiffany sets come to mind now appear gaudy to me. I got rid of them in the early 90s, so the rise in price doesn't affect me, but I wouldn't purchase them again at their original price point.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-21-2020, 11:45 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhibitman View Post

There are probably more sets I've come to dislike over time, like 1975 Topps, which annoys the heck out of me. I mean, they couldn't even make all the players from each time the same colors.
Agree about 1975. I like them because I'm nostalgic (one of first cards I collected as a kid), but who took those pictures?! The shadows across the faces of prominent cards... I know little or nothing about photography, but I know enough not to position the subject with the sun behind him. Jim Palmer, Tom Seaver & Reggie Jackson are ruined as well as Don Baylor, Rusty Staub, Felix Millan (etc. etc.). Also, the picture they used for the most prominent player in the set at the time - new HR champ Hank Aaron - was bizarre. They couldn't find a better photo than THAT to airbrush?

Last edited by Gr8Beldini; 05-21-2020 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-21-2020, 01:38 PM
mikemb mikemb is online now
Mike Lenart
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Garwood, NJ
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBear View Post
72 Topps, while I agree it captures the 70's era feel, always reminds me of a theater marquee.

Hey, that looks like the restaurant Mr. Magoo went into thinking it was the theater.

Mike
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Stanley's.jpg (19.0 KB, 284 views)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-21-2020, 04:44 PM
PowderedH2O PowderedH2O is offline
Sam Lemoine
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greensboro/High Point, NC
Posts: 519
Default

I am in the minority, but I never particularly cared for 1953 Bowman. Then I managed to get my hands on a few that were really nice, that had clear photos and no fuzz. Then I realized what I didn't like was poor conditioned 1953's. I love them now. I guess I could say the same about 1961 Topps. A Vg/Vg-Ex 1961 Topps is plain old ugly. But a sharp one with all of the original gloss is a thing of beauty.
__________________
Actively bouncing aimlessly from set to set trying to accomplish something, but getting nowhere
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-21-2020, 05:53 PM
Phil68's Avatar
Phil68 Phil68 is offline
Phil Apostle
Ph,il Ap0stle
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Midwest
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowderedH2O View Post
I am in the minority, but I never particularly cared for 1953 Bowman. Then I managed to get my hands on a few that were really nice, that had clear photos and no fuzz. Then I realized what I didn't like was poor conditioned 1953's. I love them now. I guess I could say the same about 1961 Topps. A Vg/Vg-Ex 1961 Topps is plain old ugly. But a sharp one with all of the original gloss is a thing of beauty.
I'm right there with you.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-21-2020, 06:55 PM
Tere1071 Tere1071 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowderedH2O View Post
I am in the minority, but I never particularly cared for 1953 Bowman. Then I managed to get my hands on a few that were really nice, that had clear photos and no fuzz. Then I realized what I didn't like was poor conditioned 1953's. I love them now. I guess I could say the same about 1961 Topps. A Vg/Vg-Ex 1961 Topps is plain old ugly. But a sharp one with all of the original gloss is a thing of beauty.
I just sold off a number of my Topps Heritage master sets and SSP cards to assemble a 53 Bowman color set in vg/ex condition. I am still trying to upgrade some of the cards to ex/ex plus, but I ran out of money for the moment. As for the 61s if the All-Star cards at the end of the set look crummy unless they're ex-mint or better.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05-21-2020, 07:24 PM
Bigdaddy's Avatar
Bigdaddy Bigdaddy is offline
+0m J()rd@N
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,003
Default

I read the title of this thread....well, let's just say I thought it was about something else.
__________________
Working Sets:
Baseball-
T206 SLers - Virginia League
1952 Topps - low numbers
1954 Bowman
1964 Topps Giants auto'd
1964 Topps
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-21-2020, 07:36 PM
Phil68's Avatar
Phil68 Phil68 is offline
Phil Apostle
Ph,il Ap0stle
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Midwest
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddy View Post
I read the title of this thread....well, let's just say I thought it was about something else.
Classic.

Right next to Stewie Griffin's skin conditioning products... "StewieGriffinFacials.com"

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-21-2020, 09:56 PM
vintagebaseballcardguy's Avatar
vintagebaseballcardguy vintagebaseballcardguy is online now
R0b3rt Ch!ld3rs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,169
Default



I would say '62 Topps. I always hated it, but not so much now. I am relaxing my condition OCD, and I think the green tints are awesome!

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 05-21-2020 at 09:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-24-2020, 07:44 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddy View Post
I read the title of this thread....well, let's just say I thought it was about something else.

Good thing there are almost no female collectors here...I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-24-2020, 10:54 PM
4reals's Avatar
4reals 4reals is offline
Joe W.
J0seph Wi.er
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,255
Default

1949 Bowman has grown on me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
COLLECTING DODGERS ~ Vintage, OddBall, Regional
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-25-2020, 08:11 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,090
Default

1949 Leaf. I thought it was so ugly that it was the one post-war set that I didn't collect. As time has gone by I have added some of them to my collection and have grown to appriciate them.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-12-2020, 05:17 PM
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear PolarBear is offline
Don
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4reals View Post
1949 Bowman has grown on me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If any set has "grown" on me, it might be this set. Although it's really more a product of me having ignored the set at first, then discovering it later. However, the whole name/no-name format annoys my OCD.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-12-2020, 08:51 PM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is offline
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 3,854
Default

77 Topps which to me has always been a near perfect set in terms of simplicity and ease of collecting. And several good Rookie Cards to boot.
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-19-2020, 08:39 AM
JimC JimC is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Default

I'm with you on the 1960 set. I used to think it was cheap looking but now I love it. Number one for me is probably the 34-36 Diamond Star set. I dismissed them as too simple and ugly for a long time but when I started paying more attention to the portraits and especially the backgrounds it really grew on me.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-19-2020, 09:23 AM
hcv123 hcv123 is offline
Howard Chasser
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 1,985
Default I'll throw in a pre war answer

working on a lot of Pirate team sets pre and post war. Initially had no intention of working on T207 - then had it highlighted by a board member who I bought some T206's from - At first glance didn't like it, then it definitely grew on me and has been added to the list.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1974 Laughlin Old-Time Black Stars - A Set Ahead of its Time paleocards Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 43 09-05-2017 08:18 AM
Long Time Lurker. First time poster. Crazy to gamble on this Gehrig? wheels56 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 17 05-17-2015 04:25 AM
It's the most wonderful time of the year. Cobb/Edwards auction time! iggyman Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 68 09-17-2013 12:42 AM
Anyone looking to turn their hobby into a job? Part time or full time kengoldin Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 5 11-04-2012 07:43 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.


ebay GSB