![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have 32+/- 1991 Topps Desert Shield packs; 16 "authenticated" by BBCE a while back (they no longer authenticate packs) and 16 raw that I purchased a while ago.
Packs have been stored in heat sealed wrapping to prevent moisture from damaging the gum/packs. I've been toying with opening up some of the raw packs to check on the damage, if any to the cards as well as to see how they would grade out. While I was inspecting the packs, I noticed a spot where the packs were sealed "glowed" under UV light. I never noticed this before. We previously determined Topps was experimenting with ink brighteners during the printing of this set - but this is a first for me. Does anyone have a regular 1991 Topps pack they can check under black light to see if it also glows? Just curious if both packs glowed under black light. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The closest I have is 89 and 90 Topps DoubleHeader packs and they do not glow on the flaps were sealed. Hopefully someone with some regular wax packs can help you out. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben,
The BBCE authenticated packs have a seal over the "glow" spot, so I can't tell. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() To save an email Chipper started his voyage a couple hours ago. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a couple of boxes unopened 91s . The ones I checked do not seem to glow under black light but to be honest I am not sure what I am supposed to be looking for or at
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe on the back where the top flab of the pack is glued down.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al,
There is a UV receptive substance added to the bottom of the top flap of the closed pack. The packs are wrapped in a hot selaed plastic wrap, so the UV glowing spot is not as easy to see. See pic below |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, I opened a pack. Here is the underside of the flap.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So it is the glue used to seal the pack then? That would be my guess anyway.
Are there any star players in the pack and what condition are the cards in? Last edited by bnorth; 12-23-2022 at 01:57 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not sure. There certainly isn't a "dried glue" feel to it.
Last edited by Zach Wheat; 12-23-2022 at 02:26 PM. Reason: typo |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how'd you do in the pack?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben,
Per previous discussions, glue seems to be rolled on in other 90's era packs. I am wondering if this glowing wax or glue spot is a method to tell which 91 Topps packs are DS packs. I guess I am going to have to buy some other packs and experiment. Hockey - no Chipper...but got a Ricky Henderson and Bo Jackson. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woah, this could be a big time development.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
and a very interesting development indeed. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems like the glowing mark is an artifact of the pack being search and then resealed 20+ years ago. I have talked emailed a number of people since the original post, including BBCE. BBCE is familiar with glowing spots on the pack but could not determine anything from it. They indicated the other DS packs FASC do NOT have a glowing mark on the back of the pack.
Interesting though, they use the trait discovered by Joe R and discussed in detail in previous DS threads about using a blacklight to help identify DS cards. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
COLLECTING BROOKLYN DODGERS & SUPERBAS |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1991 Topps Desert Shield | UOFLfan7 | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 18 | 01-26-2013 12:26 PM |