NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:21 PM
DWS44 DWS44 is offline
Dave Smith
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Rock Hill, SC (Charlotte, NC Area)
Posts: 12
Default

Howdy gang...me again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
I would also guess after he talks to PSA we will not hear the details of what took place.
I'll keep sharing until someone tells me to shut up.

Sorry for the delay...I was off yesterday, but today I was back to my day job and dealing with the card as I could around real work.

Late this afternoon, the VP from PSA called me as promised. It wasn't a very long conversation. He led off with apologies for the situation and to make a long story short, basically said mistakes happen, everyone is human, and so on. He said that he personally was not a grader, just coming from a collecting background. He asked me to email him the full details that I know of my history with the card and pics of the card, which I just did within the last half-hour or so. He said that once he received that, they would be sending me a pre-paid FedEx label to get the card back to them for re-examination to again determine if real or not. He noted that with the overwhelming outcry over the card, that the odds of it being real were pretty low (duh). He said if PSA still deemed to be real, it would be returned to me noting their findings. If determined to be reprint/counterfeit/fake, then I "would be compensated". He didn't go into any detail, and I didn't dig any deeper than that.

I asked about timeframe, noting how long it took to go through the process the first time and that I wasn't terribly interested in going back to the tail end of the line. He said it would not go through the normal processing, but would be a priority once received. Who knows...guess I'll see.

At this point, I have been contacted here and on ebay by several individuals wanting to buy the card as-is, for various reasons. I appreciate the interest and the stated goals of those that mentioned them, and mean no disrespect to anyone. I personally am more comfortable sending the card back and letting the PSA side of it play out. If for some reason they return the card back still saying it is real, then game on. If they attempt to make me whole and keep the card, so be it. If the card comes back in any other form, I'll just offer it back up for sale with the full story that its been through and let it ride. I do appreciate everyone's help on the board here and will keep in touch as things unfold as long as I am able to do so. There has been no mention of non-disclosure or anything like that, but if one comes along, I'll cross that bridge when I get there.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:42 PM
oldeboo oldeboo is offline
Trey
Tr.ey Bu0y
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 409
Default

Thank you for continuing to share your story. I'm sure you were initially excited to learn it was deemed genuine to then watch it snowball into this. You've certainly had an interesting dabble into the grading world. I'm sure they'll do what they have to do to get it off the market. That's probably the best thing and can't fault your decision. I'm positive anyone here would only want it as a novelty and keep it at that, but eventually at some point down the road it would be inherited or what have you and cause issues again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:52 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldeboo View Post
Thank you for continuing to share your story. I'm sure you were initially excited to learn it was deemed genuine to then watch it snowball into this. You've certainly had an interesting dabble into the grading world. I'm sure they'll do what they have to do to get it off the market. That's probably the best thing and can't fault your decision. I'm positive anyone here would only want it as a novelty and keep it at that, but eventually at some point down the road it would be inherited or what have you and cause issues again.
+1 to pretty much everything posted above.

I would like to have the card but honestly sending it back to PSA would be by far the best for you. Unless you have something in a email from them guaranteeing what you will get if deemed bad you will get little to nothing for all your trouble. That NDA is coming.

Have a great evening and thank you again for sharring your story.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2020, 09:06 PM
slightlyrounded slightlyrounded is offline
A@ron V@!llan©️our⍑
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 161
Default

I wonder what SGC would pay you for it? Seems like pretty good material for an ad campaign. 😛
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2020, 05:52 AM
MuncieNolePAZ MuncieNolePAZ is offline
Chad
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 398
Default

Thanks for sharing your story.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2020, 05:53 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slightlyrounded View Post
I wonder what SGC would pay you for it? Seems like pretty good material for an ad campaign. 😛
YESSSSS! That would GUARANTEE a ban from PSA for sure!!!!

Auction to the highest bidder!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2020, 06:09 AM
BabyRuth's Avatar
BabyRuth BabyRuth is offline
Jim B.
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: MA
Posts: 736
Default

Grading companies make mistakes - I don't believe it!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 136b_AbersonShort.jpg (78.5 KB, 561 views)
File Type: jpg 136_Aberson_WrongFlip.jpg (78.4 KB, 568 views)
__________________
Always buying Babe Ruth Cards!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2020, 06:24 AM
Rhotchkiss's Avatar
Rhotchkiss Rhotchkiss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BabyRuth View Post
Grading companies make mistakes - I don't believe it!!
Not all mistakes are created equal. Remember, PSA states that at least 2, often 3, people review each card before it is entered into their system - that is their “quality control”. That should minimize mistakes, yet some naturally will still get through.

In this case, however, a clear reprint of a 1915 Cracker Jack ran the quality control gauntlet- nobody noticed the different card stock, the perforated edges, or the fact that the writing on the back is upside down, among several other “smoking gun” tip offs. This means that either (1) PSA lies about quality control and only one person graded this and that person is wholly incompetent to grade 1915 cracker jacks, or (2) three wholly incompetent people looked at this card.

Any way you slice it, this is a massive mistake by the self-proclaimed leader and expert of card authentication and the company that tells us to “never get cheated”
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2020, 10:52 AM
perezfan's Avatar
perezfan perezfan is offline
M@RK ST€!NBERG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWS44 View Post
Howdy gang...me again.



I'll keep sharing until someone tells me to shut up.

Sorry for the delay...I was off yesterday, but today I was back to my day job and dealing with the card as I could around real work.

Late this afternoon, the VP from PSA called me as promised. It wasn't a very long conversation. He led off with apologies for the situation and to make a long story short, basically said mistakes happen, everyone is human, and so on. He said that he personally was not a grader, just coming from a collecting background. He asked me to email him the full details that I know of my history with the card and pics of the card, which I just did within the last half-hour or so. He said that once he received that, they would be sending me a pre-paid FedEx label to get the card back to them for re-examination to again determine if real or not. He noted that with the overwhelming outcry over the card, that the odds of it being real were pretty low (duh). He said if PSA still deemed to be real, it would be returned to me noting their findings. If determined to be reprint/counterfeit/fake, then I "would be compensated". He didn't go into any detail, and I didn't dig any deeper than that.

I asked about timeframe, noting how long it took to go through the process the first time and that I wasn't terribly interested in going back to the tail end of the line. He said it would not go through the normal processing, but would be a priority once received. Who knows...guess I'll see.

At this point, I have been contacted here and on ebay by several individuals wanting to buy the card as-is, for various reasons. I appreciate the interest and the stated goals of those that mentioned them, and mean no disrespect to anyone. I personally am more comfortable sending the card back and letting the PSA side of it play out. If for some reason they return the card back still saying it is real, then game on. If they attempt to make me whole and keep the card, so be it. If the card comes back in any other form, I'll just offer it back up for sale with the full story that its been through and let it ride. I do appreciate everyone's help on the board here and will keep in touch as things unfold as long as I am able to do so. There has been no mention of non-disclosure or anything like that, but if one comes along, I'll cross that bridge when I get there.
Whatever they initially offer you for buying back the card, I would insist on double their amount. They would be even bigger idiots if they are petty enough to deny you. And even if they did, I'm pretty sure you would do better in the open market.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2020, 11:34 AM
notfast's Avatar
notfast notfast is offline
Ma.tt Whi.te
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: MD
Posts: 465
Default

Do not send the card back without working out a financial agreement “if” the deem it fake.

That card will never see the light of day once you ship it to them. Ball will be in their court once they have it in hand.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-28-2020, 04:04 PM
Fuddjcal Fuddjcal is offline
Chuck Tapia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,101
Default

Thanks for sharing the story Dave. Wow. Can't make this stuff up. I would never give those crooks the card back to "make you whole". What's that, 40 bucks? I'd much rather just keep the card and tell PSA to go F themselves for the trouble they caused you having to answer too every Tom, Dick and bigger Dick.. Hold it for Ransom. It's all fake anyway, like I've said a million times. But that's just me, Mr. congeniality Nobody cares, especially PSA.

Last edited by Fuddjcal; 10-28-2020 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-28-2020, 04:15 PM
tiger8mush's Avatar
tiger8mush tiger8mush is offline
Rob G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,036
Default

Agreed, I'd keep it. Start a registry
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-28-2020, 04:25 PM
perezfan's Avatar
perezfan perezfan is offline
M@RK ST€!NBERG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,586
Default

Yes, agree... don’t let them have it back. Just not worth it to let them off the hook that easy. The same hook they manage to wiggle off of time and again.

I have never seen a company so corrupt, that continually manages to avoid any negative consequences or loss of business due to their ineptitude. It’s probably worth a few grand for them to get it back, but am guessing their offer will be a tiny fraction of that amount.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-28-2020, 05:46 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
Yes, agree... don’t let them have it back. Just not worth it to let them off the hook that easy. The same hook they manage to wiggle off of time and again.

I have never seen a company so corrupt, that continually manages to avoid any negative consequences or loss of business due to their ineptitude. It’s probably worth a few grand for them to get it back, but am guessing their offer will be a tiny fraction of that amount.
Agreed! The hobby needs an action like this. Make a spectacle of it!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1915 Real or Fake? wrm Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 04-08-2020 07:00 AM
1915 Cracker Jack Set, Original, Reprint, or Fake? UOFLfan7 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 10 06-10-2012 01:18 PM
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole Brian Van Horn Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 1 02-01-2012 07:19 PM
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill Brian Van Horn Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 0 03-11-2011 05:22 PM
1915 Cracker Jack Doolan, 1915 M101-5 Konetchy Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 1 06-09-2007 10:29 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.


ebay GSB