|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Howdy gang...me again.
Quote:
Sorry for the delay...I was off yesterday, but today I was back to my day job and dealing with the card as I could around real work. Late this afternoon, the VP from PSA called me as promised. It wasn't a very long conversation. He led off with apologies for the situation and to make a long story short, basically said mistakes happen, everyone is human, and so on. He said that he personally was not a grader, just coming from a collecting background. He asked me to email him the full details that I know of my history with the card and pics of the card, which I just did within the last half-hour or so. He said that once he received that, they would be sending me a pre-paid FedEx label to get the card back to them for re-examination to again determine if real or not. He noted that with the overwhelming outcry over the card, that the odds of it being real were pretty low (duh). He said if PSA still deemed to be real, it would be returned to me noting their findings. If determined to be reprint/counterfeit/fake, then I "would be compensated". He didn't go into any detail, and I didn't dig any deeper than that. I asked about timeframe, noting how long it took to go through the process the first time and that I wasn't terribly interested in going back to the tail end of the line. He said it would not go through the normal processing, but would be a priority once received. Who knows...guess I'll see. At this point, I have been contacted here and on ebay by several individuals wanting to buy the card as-is, for various reasons. I appreciate the interest and the stated goals of those that mentioned them, and mean no disrespect to anyone. I personally am more comfortable sending the card back and letting the PSA side of it play out. If for some reason they return the card back still saying it is real, then game on. If they attempt to make me whole and keep the card, so be it. If the card comes back in any other form, I'll just offer it back up for sale with the full story that its been through and let it ride. I do appreciate everyone's help on the board here and will keep in touch as things unfold as long as I am able to do so. There has been no mention of non-disclosure or anything like that, but if one comes along, I'll cross that bridge when I get there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you for continuing to share your story. I'm sure you were initially excited to learn it was deemed genuine to then watch it snowball into this. You've certainly had an interesting dabble into the grading world. I'm sure they'll do what they have to do to get it off the market. That's probably the best thing and can't fault your decision. I'm positive anyone here would only want it as a novelty and keep it at that, but eventually at some point down the road it would be inherited or what have you and cause issues again.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I would like to have the card but honestly sending it back to PSA would be by far the best for you. Unless you have something in a email from them guaranteeing what you will get if deemed bad you will get little to nothing for all your trouble. That NDA is coming. Have a great evening and thank you again for sharring your story. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder what SGC would pay you for it? Seems like pretty good material for an ad campaign. 😛
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for sharing your story.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Auction to the highest bidder! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Grading companies make mistakes - I don't believe it!!
__________________
Always buying Babe Ruth Cards!!! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Not all mistakes are created equal. Remember, PSA states that at least 2, often 3, people review each card before it is entered into their system - that is their “quality control”. That should minimize mistakes, yet some naturally will still get through.
In this case, however, a clear reprint of a 1915 Cracker Jack ran the quality control gauntlet- nobody noticed the different card stock, the perforated edges, or the fact that the writing on the back is upside down, among several other “smoking gun” tip offs. This means that either (1) PSA lies about quality control and only one person graded this and that person is wholly incompetent to grade 1915 cracker jacks, or (2) three wholly incompetent people looked at this card. Any way you slice it, this is a massive mistake by the self-proclaimed leader and expert of card authentication and the company that tells us to “never get cheated” |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Do not send the card back without working out a financial agreement “if” the deem it fake.
That card will never see the light of day once you ship it to them. Ball will be in their court once they have it in hand. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for sharing the story Dave. Wow. Can't make this stuff up. I would never give those crooks the card back to "make you whole". What's that, 40 bucks? I'd much rather just keep the card and tell PSA to go F themselves for the trouble they caused you having to answer too every Tom, Dick and bigger Dick.. Hold it for Ransom. It's all fake anyway, like I've said a million times. But that's just me, Mr. congeniality Nobody cares, especially PSA.
Last edited by Fuddjcal; 10-28-2020 at 04:07 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed, I'd keep it. Start a registry
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, agree... don’t let them have it back. Just not worth it to let them off the hook that easy. The same hook they manage to wiggle off of time and again.
I have never seen a company so corrupt, that continually manages to avoid any negative consequences or loss of business due to their ineptitude. It’s probably worth a few grand for them to get it back, but am guessing their offer will be a tiny fraction of that amount. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1915 Real or Fake? | wrm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 04-08-2020 07:00 AM |
1915 Cracker Jack Set, Original, Reprint, or Fake? | UOFLfan7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-10-2012 01:18 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 02-01-2012 07:19 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2011 05:22 PM |
1915 Cracker Jack Doolan, 1915 M101-5 Konetchy | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 10:29 AM |