|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: leon
Ok Folks, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: jay behrens
looks good to me except #6. Can you axplain that one a bit. Do you mean aone registry for all cards from HOFers from the time frame or do you mean a seperate registry for each set that only involves HOFers? I really like the t and e set registries. You could also add D and W sets too. Don't think there are too many in this area that fall into the R sets. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: leon
Hey Jay, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: runscott
I'm building a collection of HOF'ers who played prior to WWI and after 1900 - it doesn't matter what set each example comes from, but I'm trying to obtain my favorite cards of each. It's kind of like Halleygator's collection, only more limited in time-frame. I know that others have similar collections - it would be very interesting to see what "types" they pick for each HOF'er. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: petecld
What about for those collectors who just collect one player adding to the registry a "player/type collections" which would be one card from every set a particular player appears in BUT just the sets issued during their active playing days. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: leon
Hey guys and girls ...that are interested, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: Andy Baran
I was never opposed to the Set Registry idea, I just didn't think that my collection would fit into any pre determined category. If what you are proposing actually happens, I may consider joining. Keep us posted. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: Brian Hodes
Basically a registry that featured all HOFers from during their active days would encompass most (if not all) of the suggestions above. Sure Leon's Kelly card would be far more interesting than mine (which is "just" an old judge/color card) but we could both be listed their. Likewise, Runscott's cards could be there with whatever HOF card he thinks is most interesting (even if it is "just" a T206) as well as Andy's which are generally Rookies as I understand it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: jay behrens
SGC weights the cards based on desirability and rarity, so the B-W would have a higher weighting than Fan Craze card. It hurts you in over all grade beucase they a card with a rating of 8 and grade 50 would count as 8 cards grading 50, which is a stiff penalty, but the get your set superiority score moved up quiet a bit. Haven't seen how they figure that out yet, but would be interested in seeing the formula |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: runscott
I couldn't care less if my collection is judged "#1", so the point value is irrelevant to me. But I think it would be really cool just to see what others are collecting, online - wish MW had included scans in his Hockey set. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: runscott
I'm collecting football cards of every player who played for Texas A&M (vintage of course). This could also apply to baseball, but you wouldn't find as many vintage cards. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
SGC Set Registry II
Posted By: MW
Scott -- |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA or SGC Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-20-2007 04:47 PM |
Ambitious SGC Set registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-25-2004 11:13 AM |
SGC Set Registry Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-20-2003 10:41 AM |
SGC set registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-24-2002 02:01 PM |
SGC Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-29-2002 05:04 PM |