|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
How is this a PSA 5 with no qualifier?
I’ve been researching this set a bit and recently came across this example. Like my own card, this Whitey Ford card has an ink stamp on the rear of the card for the school nurse. The stamp was obviously applied by the school nurse after the card was produced so how is this a PSA 5 without a qualifier?
Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 11-08-2024 at 09:50 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You can select (or unselect, I don't remember its been a while) a "No Qualifiers" Box when submitting; probs what happened here
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
That checkbox is long gone.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I believe 'School Nurse-Teachers' qualify for no qualifiers.
Brian |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, most of the school nurses are not qualified.
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed from 2012 to 2024. Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served. If you want fries with your order, just speak up. Thank you all. Now nearly PQ. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Depends where you live but
in some state's school districts , the Nurses are authorized to perform gender-affirming surgery right there in their offices if like , for example , any young boys are overheard singing show tunes . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Which states are those, retard?
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Did I read they was going to do away with qualifiers ?
Or was that a dream ? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
...do all cards of this issue have the stamp?
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Getting back on topic, there are examples of cards from this issue without the nurse’s stamp.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I was waiting for someone to catch that! I fixed it to prevent further derailing of the thread though.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I would say that the stamp was applied by the original issuer. The cards were handed out to school nurse who applied the stamp. Similar to many other "back stamps" that are on E and W issues. So my vote is no qualifier needed.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I’m not sure I understand your reply. Are you saying that the original printer applied the stamp or the nurse did? I can’t see the stamp being applied by the printer. It’s haphazardly done and screams of a old rubber stamp and ink pad. I think it was most certainly done by the nurse after the fact when she received them hence why there are examples that don’t have the stamp on them.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
During my last hospital stay, my nurse proudly showed off her 'tramp stamp' ink to me.
She said it loosely translates to "Buy the card, not the holder." nursetrampstamp.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes The Nurse was given the cards to Distribute and applied the stamp before issuing the cards to students. Happend many times to various E and W cards where back stamps are applied. You have never heard of a back stamped card before? E94 W554 W515 M104 and M105's ...look them up and I think you will agree no qualifier required. J |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
This is great, poster gets butthurt about a pretty harmless, fairly obvious gender joke and then uses a derogatory slur that is more offensive then the joke.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
How is this a PSA 5 with no qualifier?
Quote:
Who says it's pretty harmless? If you want to immortalize your general stupidity on a sports card-specific forum...keep going. And yes, retard is the last insensitive term I have failed to drop from my youth. Maybe someday.
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. Last edited by CardPadre; 11-08-2024 at 09:01 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Of course, I’ve heard of those cards before, but I look at it differently. The card was issued by the manufacturer without the stamp. Any alteration to that card like an ink stamp should result in a qualifier because it was done after production. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Lots of us used to say it, but now it's in the same class as the "N" word (racially) and the "F" word (sexually). Most of the people afflicted know exactly what you are saying about them and find it very hurtful.
__________________
Be sure to subscribe to my YouTube Channel, The Stuff Of Greatness. New videos are uploaded every week... https://www.youtube.com/@tsogreatness/videos |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If the end user added a backstamp or other writing then the card would not be as "Issued" and deserving of a qualifier. But the youg person who took Whitey home that day took it home as issued by the Nurse. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Not Sure of All of Them...
However California & New Mexico for Sure * And at least You got His Moniker Politically Correct... They "Took back the Tard" 2 years ago... They/Them/He found it Offensive to be Labeled "Mentally Challenged"
__________________
Life's Grand, Denny Walsh |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
How is this a PSA 5 with no qualifier?
Quote:
Did someone just challenge you to prove you’re a genius in one incoherent post?
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. Last edited by CardPadre; 11-09-2024 at 04:08 PM. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
You are replying to jokes, not serious claims.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. Last edited by CardPadre; 11-09-2024 at 04:46 PM. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Could we maybe stop with all the nonsense in this thread and get back to the discussion on the original question?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Card
Vintagedeputy-
I too believe PSA missed this one for sure, by their own standards. There very much should be one of those dreaded qualifiers on this card. If I was czar, PSA would be forced to drop the stupid qualifiers and reflect the presence of the stamp in a uniform way- i.e, stamps drop a grade by 2 full points, so the card in question could be a PSA 3 without qualifier. 2nd question you posed- there are FAR too many people on this site who can't stay on topic, or who wish to divert the topic for their own ends. When you bring it up, their feelings get hurt. Trent King |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
I'd be willing to guess that people at PSA wouldn't have a clue about whether to give it the MK qualifier or not. In this case, I bet PSA just missed it.
What is the rule of thumb on back stamps/overprints as it pertains to the hobby (not grading)?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hard to say 100%, because there are some covered bits. And also because as is common, neither the artist nor the recipient have a clue, so they usually just hope that it means whatever their cheat sheet suggests, and don’t know how to actually position anything. But it looks like the first character is actually 2 characters stacked on top of one another. 自 營。 Hard to translate this, but probably something like “search yourself” or “yourself seek”, then 福, which means blessings or happiness. And then 強 means strong or powerful. Hard to decipher what someone was trying to say here, but maybe something like: seek for yourself and you will find happiness and power. But for the “buy the card” die hard fans, this is probably close enough.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I too think that qualifiers are stupid and much prefer the way SGC grades. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
PSA missing some ink that should get the MK qualifier and giving the card a straight grade is hardly anything new. My LCS this summer had a nice '63 Aaron, except with pen marks on the back. It was a straight PSA 5.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Prewar, Bowman & Topps Cubs team endeavors. Last edited by jchcollins; 11-12-2024 at 03:48 PM. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Perhaps as a way to track what cards were given out. Anyone recall the "TB tine test?" I don't like needles at all, and getting stuck with the Katyusha rocket of needles (Ok, it was only 5 at once, but still 5x worse than one) was the makings of a bad day. A free baseball card would have gone a long way to making it "better" or at least more tolerable. Maybe the stamps were to indicate ones given out for taking that test or some other test? Or, just similar to the Carousel discs which were blank backed MSA discs rubber stamped with the store stamp before issue. Or as mentioned, the many stamps issued with back stamps for a variety of purposes, from repurposing a set to identifying the individual who packed the product. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
I am a post war collector and the only pre war set I collect is the 1923 Fleer set, and I only collect it as an extention of my post war Fleer run, 1959-2007. The cards are just W 515 cards with a Feer back stamp. I assume Fleer obtained some and stamped them post production or maybe under a license agreement.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
This is great, poster gets butthurt about a pretty harmless, fairly obvious gender joke and then uses a derogatory slur that is more offensive then the joke.
We were all thinking the same thing... |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=Bpm0014;2474535]This is great, poster gets butthurt about a pretty harmless, fairly obvious gender joke and then uses a derogatory slur that is more offensive then the joke.
We were all thinking the same thing...[/Q I WAS DEFINITELY NOT THINKING THE SAME THING. Speak for yourself. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 06:02 PM |
Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 12:38 PM |
(ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 06:30 PM |
PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 07:04 PM |
PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 02:38 AM |