|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
General chat and off topic stuff. Please no politics or religion.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Two things. One is that we should maybe think about why, in spite of the risks of provoking Putin that many people are highlighting, Eastern European countries wanted to join NATO anyway. I assume they knew the risks very well, but thought it was still safer than not joining. If NATO doesn't let them join, it sends a message to Putin: we don't care about these countries and won't protect them. That's what he thought was the case with Ukraine, and we can see how that's working out.
Two, the "encircled by NATO" thing is not all that's going on. Putin has a set of ideological beliefs that are driving his actions as well. https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/0...ssian-fascism/ Ted
__________________
My website: https://edwardwclayton.wixsite.com/my-site |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Since the bulk of the discussion began on the question of how much value should be placed on the reporting of major journalism outlets (or in Layman’s term: “sheep blindly trust MSM”). I think it is particularly noteworthy that today the New York Times pulled all of its foreign correspondents out of Russia. It has held a continual presence there since 1921 - through the rise of bolshevism, the power grab of Stalin, through the Second World War and the sieges that ground the Nazi war machine to a halt, through the Cold War, until today. A paper with more than 130 Pulitzer Prizes and multiple Peabody awards, that defended itself in multiple Supreme Court cases that lay the basis for freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and that on at least two occasions has been publicly threatened by the sitting President of the United States of America lowered their presence in Russia to zero. They did it to protect their correspondents from Russia’s new law criminalizing any news the state disagrees with.
The point of news isn’t affirmation of your beliefs, the point is to provide facts that can help you make educated and informed decisions. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...eedom.amp.html
__________________
Always looking for rare Tommy Bridges items. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That and they never leave their echo chamber of confirmation bias. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
+1
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...+change&page=2 You claimed I believe in climate change because I want to punish, weaken, and control "the people that I hate, the ones that voted for," in YOUR words, "The Orange Meanie." Remember that? YOU brought up politics. Good times, huh? And your response to Irv's political statement ... crickets. Very selective of you, don't you think?
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T _____________________________ Don't believe everything you think |
|
|