![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was lucky to finish the set while it was still pretty obscure. Those, the 84 Topps Encased, 85 Topps Minis, 88 Topps Cloth 89 Topps Big Head Suckers and Topps 89 Mets/Yankee proof DHs were the toughest 80s sets for me.
It would be interesting for someone to try to complete the 82 set in gray transition cards....but not me ![]() |
#152
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful Brett Christian! I will keep an eye out for the Brett IA.
Don’t lie Al, I’m sure you already have the Blacklessing set ![]() I do like the Trammell run that jimtb posted in this thread...would be cool to have that of the stars imo. I have gotten interested in the Blueless, but not so interested that I feel the need to go after the entire checklist. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it is incorrect to call it a parallel set. They are just print defects, no black or partial black. They got referred to as a set because SCD gave them a separate listing in their Catalog when they did post 80 listings.
In my mind they are less of a parallel set than even the Topps 1968 Milton Bradley or 62 green tint cards. I do have a list for the 396 card broken down by sheet if you can not find it on line Last edited by ALR-bishop; 08-08-2020 at 01:59 PM. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have not double checked it but here is list from prior thread. See post 23
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=115843 Last edited by ALR-bishop; 08-08-2020 at 12:08 PM. |
#156
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I thought I would share a contact sheet of scanned HOF’s and stars from my completed Blackless set. I could care less about the assigned grade, but I am glad they are all well protected now. They look great in a binder too! ![]() ![]() Superior fit sleeves and 4 pocket pages... |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by hockeyhockey; 08-27-2020 at 09:40 PM. |
#158
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Would love to see examples of these if anyone has any.
I have the Cooper and have seen the Madlock and Cappuzello. ![]() |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#161
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not Blackless completely, but def on its way. Here’s a blackless-ing (as some clever ebay sellers call them) sheet of the highly sought after C-sheet cards. Think I should keep intact or chop it up and piece out?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
COLLECTING DODGERS ~ Vintage, OddBall, Regional Last edited by 4reals; 10-26-2020 at 12:06 PM. |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I note the C sheet on ebay, looks very nice and "Blacklessing"
|
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in tact
|
#164
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Now I would only cut up if you know what you are doing and with proper equipment. I have cut up a lot of sheets and every card was exactly the same size when finished. I would never do a hack job om something like that, that would be horrible. |
#165
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great find! Keep as a sheet imo...
Is it faded? It looks like a lot of the other colors are losing color too. Maybe just my bad eyes. |
#166
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It does have that appearance but no, not faded. It appears they were low on ink during this sheet print for other colors as well as certain small areas on some cards are missing ink. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
COLLECTING DODGERS ~ Vintage, OddBall, Regional |
#167
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Curious if there are Blackless cards that have other colors missing full coverage. I plan on looking through mine... |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1982 Topps is a Monster, lots of variations,including wrongBacks, Blueless, color tones variations,etc. The most weird Print defect is the Hector Cruz Blackless version. All cards have red dot in top of nose and medium to large smudge. In my research, possibly 2 or 3 Cruz card without smudge in existence.
|
#169
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After going through all of my 1982 Topps cards, the only one I have that is even close to blackless is one of those "low ink" type printings.
|
#170
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PWCC new auction.
I find it hard to believe that PWCC and other auction companies can’t see BLACK ink. In a new slab too. Come on PSA do better. ![]() ![]() |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like the 62 green tints or 68 Milton Bradleys I think unless graders follow particular odd variations closely themselves they would have a hard time telling one from the other without examples of both in hand via the cards themselves or contrasting scans.
|
#172
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is incredible from PSA, they know about variation and PWCC know what is a Blackless, not the first time they up for sale mislabeled psa.
|
#173
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hi jaguar-9742, Thank you for reaching out about this issue. Our team has taken a look at this and have adjusted our title and listing. Thank you for your interest and participation in our auction! Gavin Johnston PWCC Marketplace |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slightly OT - 1982 Topps Blackless | JasonL | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 30 | 01-25-2011 01:24 PM |