|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
If I had won that for $15.50 I would have to attend church for a month out of guilt.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cliff --I think for forgiveness you would have to give it back .
It has been awhile but I seem to recall that in putting my set together the Ryan, Henderson and Morris were the ones that set me back the most |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Al, I agree Henderson, Morris, and Ryan are higher value Blackless. The Henderson and Morris probably due to scarcity and Ryan for player collectors.
IMO the Henderson is nuts because it is a scarce C sheet and a player collector favorite. Paid $20.50 and he said he was offered 3k the next week. He did not accept. I know I would not accept that for mine either Cliff, I can't imagine being that seller and finding out what he sold. Last edited by bswhiten; 07-25-2021 at 10:32 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That's incredible, a Henderson's Blackless for that price, was the deal of entire life. I had the Good Luck to found Ryan and Morris in Blackless version. Other hard is Hector Cruz without Print Flaw.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
ben - do you know how much the person who won the auction put in for his max bid? curious how high they would've been willing to go. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
He wouldn't tell me, but he did say it was a lot for than $25
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1982 Topps Blackless Rickey Henderson | h2oya311 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 07-10-2012 10:17 PM |
WTB - 1982 Topps Blackless to complete set | doug.goodman | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 04-13-2012 05:38 PM |
WTB - A whole bunch of Topps 1982 blackless | doug.goodman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-04-2011 12:51 PM |
Slightly OT - 1982 Topps Blackless | JasonL | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 30 | 01-25-2011 12:24 PM |
1982 Topps Blackless Tigers | insidethewrapper | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-04-2010 09:33 AM |