NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2022, 02:38 PM
Vintagedeputy's Avatar
Vintagedeputy Vintagedeputy is offline
Jim Reynolds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Glen Allen, Va.
Posts: 1,125
Default Ever seen a fake 1971 Topps Pete Rose?

Found this card online. Seller fully admitted that he had questions about the authenticity of it. It was $10 shipped, so I figured what the heck.

Quality looks good but I believe it’s a fake. The pete rose, blue dot and outfield are all offset from known examples, shown here.

Who’s out there faking 71 Rose’s? I know the rookies were faked, but this seems like an odd choice to make a fake from. Anyone ever seen a fake 71 Rose before?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg F1378CBC-8C2E-45AB-A4C4-45A29B041BE0.jpg (195.5 KB, 231 views)
File Type: jpg 057BCFD7-9E14-4543-A147-42A58EDDB2D2.jpg (67.0 KB, 227 views)

Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 12-02-2022 at 03:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:05 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,581
Default

Fake, though I don't recall encountering one of these before. Seems kind of pointless to fake VG 1971 Rose's, but somebody evidently has.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:21 PM
Vintagedeputy's Avatar
Vintagedeputy Vintagedeputy is offline
Jim Reynolds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Glen Allen, Va.
Posts: 1,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
Fake, though I don't recall encountering one of these before. Seems kind of pointless to fake VG 1971 Rose's, but somebody evidently has.
They did a nice job, whoever it was.

I may send it off for autographing by Rose, which would seem fitting for this card!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:56 PM
YazFenway08 YazFenway08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 532
Default

wow. it's like the other thread on "thin" or possibly fake 64 topps. Seems like a lot of effort, but if you can do a lot of them quickly, I guess every $10 in pure profit adds up?

How does the back look and how does it feel in hand? did they get the stock right?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:05 PM
Vintagedeputy's Avatar
Vintagedeputy Vintagedeputy is offline
Jim Reynolds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Glen Allen, Va.
Posts: 1,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YazFenway08 View Post
wow. it's like the other thread on "thin" or possibly fake 64 topps. Seems like a lot of effort, but if you can do a lot of them quickly, I guess every $10 in pure profit adds up?

How does the back look and how does it feel in hand? did they get the stock right?
Back looks nice. The paper stock feels right but it’s a bit less flexible than a normal card. Just a bit more rigid, I guess?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 19C64BD6-27C4-49C6-9ACB-D4CC512CC45E.jpg (191.9 KB, 201 views)
File Type: jpg 67118404-3166-4944-AF91-EAC44DE5F941.jpg (245.6 KB, 205 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:11 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,581
Default

The back looks better than the front. The image doesn't 'feel right'.

The 64's are authentic. I have poor condition common 64's of that type that I can trace back 40 years. No one was faking penny cards; there's just multiple stocks used (even of the same color tone) in most Topps sets.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2022, 01:57 PM
Hxcmilkshake's Avatar
Hxcmilkshake Hxcmilkshake is offline
St@n Go.len
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 853
Default

Horrible fake. Idk how anyone can say its good...the fonts are not even close. Garbage.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1971 Topps Pete Rose EX+, $sold mintacular 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 2 03-31-2022 02:13 PM
1971 topps #100 Pete Rose mb $20 Sold rjackson44 Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. 4 08-24-2021 02:53 PM
FS 1971 Topps Pete Rose PSA 8 SOLD Peter_Spaeth 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 0 05-17-2019 02:54 PM
How do you tell if a 1963 Topps Pete Rose is a Fake? vintagehofrookies Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 1 07-21-2011 09:52 PM
1971 Topps Pete Rose PSA 6 Archive 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 03-18-2009 10:03 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM.


ebay GSB