NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #401  
Old 02-20-2023, 08:39 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve5838 View Post
The card I posted a picture of on 12/22 has been reholdered by PSA.... but $39 later (including shipping) the label stayed the same. Here is the new scan from PSA. I still don't get it. I guess they are no longer putting the Ad on Scoreboard label on any version other than the clear?? After so much back and forth with them on this particular submission I will not be sending any more RJs to PSA. Be careful if having this particular label from a TPG matters to you. Steve
That sucks. I don't care what they label them as if they would at least be consistent with those labels. PSA sucks at labeling the 89 Fleer Bill Ripken cards also. There are several different versions they will label as "Black Scribble Over Error" and those different versions can vary in price from $10 to $1250 in the same grade.

With all the different versions I am not sure there is a realistic way for them to get it correct most of the time. With the 3 different color tints and the huge amount of difference in the darkness of the tints even in the same color of tints, then add in the stencil and box versions it really is just too much.

Last edited by bnorth; 02-20-2023 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #402  
Old 02-20-2023, 06:56 PM
steve5838 steve5838 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
That sucks. I don't care what they label them as if they would at least be consistent with those labels. PSA sucks at labeling the 89 Fleer Bill Ripken cards also. There are several different versions they will label as "Black Scribble Over Error" and those different versions can vary in price from $10 to $1250 in the same grade.

With all the different versions I am not sure there is a realistic way for them to get it correct most of the time. With the 3 different color tints and the huge amount of difference in the darkness of the tints even in the same color of tints, then add in the stencil and box versions it really is just too much.
Ben, I think you are probably right. I do care how they label my cards though so I guess I am glad I purchased when I did and most of mine say Ad on Scoreboard. Still I think PSA owes it to customers to clarify their new labeling convention and confirm it has in fact changed. People are willing to pay more for the Scoreboard label and its not fair to suck money from customers who are assuming their cards will get the Scoreboard label designations (based on all the pictures of PSA slabbed Scoreboard labeled cards that show up when you search APR recent sales on PSA's own site). It seems like bait and switch to me. It just isn't right. I don't care where they draw the lines between their 3 defined versions so long as they are transparent with what the distinguishing criteria are and consistent with the application. Steve

Last edited by steve5838; 02-20-2023 at 07:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #403  
Old 02-21-2023, 11:15 AM
jacksoncoupage jacksoncoupage is offline
Dylan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: OR/CA
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
That sucks. I don't care what they label them as if they would at least be consistent with those labels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve5838 View Post
It just isn't right. I don't care where they draw the lines between their 3 defined versions so long as they are transparent with what the distinguishing criteria are and consistent with the application. Steve
Tall, tall order at this point in time. As we all know, they never have been and there is no incentive for them to start. PSA of today has a mostly antagonistic relationship with its customers, especially toward those bothering them with nonsense like variations and "difficult" items (aka anything not in Beckett/SCD annuals).
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/

Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr
Reply With Quote
  #404  
Old 02-21-2023, 12:02 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,815
Default

I am not a graded collector and have never sent a card to be graded, but I get why grading companies would not be well equipped to deal with odd ball or non standard items. Since Lemke retired and then the catalogs quit publishing there is no real viable vehicle to get variations/variants widespread hobby recognition that the grading companies can follow

I like the update Mike Cady is doing to the Gilkeson publications but it does not seem to be widely followed. And it involves the same problem of what is or should be the accepted definition of a variation in the hobby.

If you just like to collect variations, variants, recurring print defects and print oddities it does not matter much. But if your goal is increasing the value of your oddities I guess PSA or other grading company recognition of them is your only route at present.
Reply With Quote
  #405  
Old 03-29-2023, 10:47 AM
steve5838 steve5838 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 102
Default Mention of #381 in April PSA Magazine

I just received the April 2023 copy of PSA Magazine and was pleasantly surprised to see a call out to #381 in an article titled "Cinderella Men". The writeup is riddled with inaccurate info (and it would have been nice if they had shown one of the versions where you can make out the sign) but nonetheless I figured others here may be interested.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230329_193201_Gallery.jpg (188.0 KB, 388 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230329_193236_Gallery.jpg (159.6 KB, 374 views)

Last edited by steve5838; 03-29-2023 at 05:33 PM. Reason: rotate pictures
Reply With Quote
  #406  
Old 03-30-2023, 09:48 AM
Statfreak101 Statfreak101 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 93
Default

Thanks for sharing.

That picture and example is LMAO material.
Reply With Quote
  #407  
Old 03-30-2023, 11:41 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve5838 View Post
I just received the April 2023 copy of PSA Magazine and was pleasantly surprised to see a call out to #381 in an article titled "Cinderella Men". The writeup is riddled with inaccurate info (and it would have been nice if they had shown one of the versions where you can make out the sign) but nonetheless I figured others here may be interested.
They should have borrowed a picture from you for the article. One of these days I have another card to send you.
Reply With Quote
  #408  
Old 04-03-2023, 08:33 AM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Letís do a little test to see if anyone here has what it takes to become a PSA card grader. Iíll post some images of graded 1989 Fleer Randy Johnson cards and ask members to identify the correct label. PSA labels the different versions of the cards Ad on Scoreboard(AOS), Ad Partially Obscured(APO) and Ad Completely Blacked Out(ACBO). Please guess which of the three labels is used for the posted cards. Are you PSA material? Weíll start with an easy one.
Reply With Quote
  #409  
Old 04-03-2023, 09:23 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatorade View Post
Let’s do a little test to see if anyone here has what it takes to become a PSA card grader. I’ll post some images of graded 1989 Fleer Randy Johnson cards and ask members to identify the correct label. PSA labels the different versions of the cards Ad on Scoreboard(AOS), Ad Partially Obscured(APO) and Ad Completely Blacked Out(ACBO). Please guess which of the three labels is used for the posted cards. Are you PSA material? We’ll start with an easy one.
1) 1987 Topps Barry Bonds
2) 2012 Donruss Derek Jeter
3) 1910 T210 Joe Jackson
4) 1999 Fleer Tradition Wade Boggs
5) 1983 Donruss Jose Canseco

I would bet these are as close as PSA got.

EDIT: To add they are all Add Completely Blocked Out but as someone who has collected a lot of these cards PSA is about 50/50 on getting them correct.

Last edited by bnorth; 04-03-2023 at 09:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #410  
Old 04-13-2023, 07:05 AM
steve5838 steve5838 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatorade View Post
Letís do a little test to see if anyone here has what it takes to become a PSA card grader. Iíll post some images of graded 1989 Fleer Randy Johnson cards and ask members to identify the correct label. PSA labels the different versions of the cards Ad on Scoreboard(AOS), Ad Partially Obscured(APO) and Ad Completely Blacked Out(ACBO). Please guess which of the three labels is used for the posted cards. Are you PSA material? Weíll start with an easy one.
I also vote for the Ad Completely Blacked Out label on each of these.
Reply With Quote
  #411  
Old 04-17-2023, 09:56 PM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Steve and Ben are both correct, but they are not PSA grader material.The cards are all examples of the common version and what should be labeled as Ad Completely Blacked Out, but instead they are labeled as all three of the different PSA versions.
Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 04-21-2023, 11:17 AM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Round 2, letís try again. Are these cards Ad on Scoreboard, Ad Partially Obscured, or Ad Completely Blacked Out?
Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 04-21-2023, 12:09 PM
Smanzari Smanzari is offline
Stefan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatorade View Post
Round 2, letís try again. Are these cards Ad on Scoreboard, Ad Partially Obscured, or Ad Completely Blacked Out?
Can't tell from your pics; second down on the left appears to be Partially Obscured, but could be a dark scan with the full.

I actually just found a nice stack of these and literally never noticed the "Black Box" version until I started looking (knew the others) - was kind of cool to find!
Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 04-21-2023, 01:57 PM
steve5838 steve5838 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 102
Default

I also vote for "Ad Partially Obscured" on all of these round 2 cards. From my recent experience with PSA this is the only label they are putting on any Marlboro cards for me these days.

Being that it's Friday I figured I would waste a little time... A while back someone asked me about light on the clear version card. I recorded a little clip that others may be interested in seeing too and posted it up on YouTube. It doesn't have sound, but I threw captions on it. I guess you need to turn on the captions though... sorry, I probably should have just recorded audio. Also, sorry for the jittery camera it was just taken on my phone.

https://youtu.be/R0BaA8letSE

Steve

Last edited by steve5838; 04-21-2023 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 04-21-2023, 06:39 PM
jacksoncoupage jacksoncoupage is offline
Dylan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: OR/CA
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatorade View Post
Round 2, letís try again. Are these cards Ad on Scoreboard, Ad Partially Obscured, or Ad Completely Blacked Out?
Ad Completely Blacked Out. Obviously.
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/

Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr
Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 04-22-2023, 06:36 AM
steve5838 steve5838 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksoncoupage View Post
Ad Completely Blacked Out. Obviously.
This is where it gets tricky and depends where they draw the line between partially obscured and ad completely blacked out. But of course there are differences between these and the fully corrected version. As a PSA grader I think I will just go middle of the road on all these cards with the Partially Obscured label so I'm never too wrong. Haha.
Reply With Quote
  #417  
Old 04-24-2023, 12:09 AM
jacksoncoupage jacksoncoupage is offline
Dylan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: OR/CA
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve5838 View Post
This is where it gets tricky and depends where they draw the line between partially obscured and ad completely blacked out. But of course there are differences between these and the fully corrected version. As a PSA grader I think I will just go middle of the road on all these cards with the Partially Obscured label so I'm never too wrong. Haha.
Sorry, that was overt sarcasm.
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/

Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr
Reply With Quote
  #418  
Old 05-06-2023, 08:36 AM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Dylan was 100% spot on. Despite these cards all being examples of error variations, with a couple actually fairly lightly tinted versions, PSA has slapped the Ad Completely Blacked Out label on all of them. We have a new PSA grader in our midst!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2804.jpg (207.7 KB, 224 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2803.jpg (209.2 KB, 226 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2802.jpg (212.3 KB, 225 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2793.jpg (196.7 KB, 222 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2791.jpg (196.5 KB, 224 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2790.jpg (198.8 KB, 223 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2788.jpg (190.7 KB, 220 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2787.jpg (201.5 KB, 224 views)
Reply With Quote
  #419  
Old 05-25-2023, 02:03 PM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,388
Default

I have missed a few pages so if this was mentioned already, please forgive me. I was perusing 22' Topps Heritage and saw this one.

I am thinking this has to be on purpose as a designer joke -



Even Jeter got in on the action -

__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #420  
Old 05-27-2023, 06:40 PM
jacksoncoupage jacksoncoupage is offline
Dylan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: OR/CA
Posts: 293
Default

Surprised to see these listed by multiple sellers. Paging Rich Klein...

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Baseball/...board)/1950804
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/

Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr
Reply With Quote
  #421  
Old 05-27-2023, 08:19 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksoncoupage View Post
Surprised to see these listed by multiple sellers. Paging Rich Klein...

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Baseball/...board)/1950804
Then they could fix the other hundreds if not thousands of messed up listings. I used to love that site but it has been a shit show for years and has gotten a little worse every year for a long time.

You can't even search the site by recent listings of specific cards.
Reply With Quote
  #422  
Old 05-30-2023, 10:09 PM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
I have missed a few pages so if this was mentioned already, please forgive me. I was perusing 22' Topps Heritage and saw this one.

I am thinking this has to be on purpose as a designer joke -



Even Jeter got in on the action -

I donít think this is the ad that was included in the photos used for the 2022 archives cards, but Yankee Stadium did at one time have the same Marlboro ad that was at the Vet and in the background of the 1989 Fleer Johnson error cards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2994.jpg (187.8 KB, 148 views)
Reply With Quote
  #423  
Old 08-24-2023, 11:41 AM
Hatorade Hatorade is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 69
Default Another image of Randy with cigarette ad?

Iím not sure how we missed this one!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3325.jpg (126.4 KB, 55 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1980's, 1989 fleer, error cards, randy johnson, variations



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1989 fleer Randy Johnson hoebob69 Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) 63 02-24-2018 12:07 PM
New 89 Fleer Randy Johnson Marlboro error version? bnorth Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) 4 03-04-2016 06:21 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:51 PM.


ebay GSB