NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2013, 08:34 PM
sfacujackcat sfacujackcat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 270
Default Debating whether I should grade this

Picked this up this weekend and was curious if you guys that it was grading worthy. I know it's a common, but it's from a mid-1950s set, and if it will grade high enough then I think it will be worth it.

But that's the question. Will it grade high enough (8 or above) to make it worth it. The card is crease free upon inspection of both front and back. It is a piece of hair in the top loader near the hat.

Thoughts?





Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2013, 08:40 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is online now
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,038
Default

No way in hell is that card an '8'. Save your money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2013, 08:41 PM
sfacujackcat sfacujackcat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
No way in hell is that card an '8'. Save your money.
That's what I need to know. Thanks. What keeps it from there? I've never had a card graded, but it looked pretty sharp to the naked eye.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2013, 08:42 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is online now
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,038
Default

Bottom left corner on the front. Top right corner on the reverse....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-31-2013, 08:44 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is online now
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,038
Default

Here is a similar, if not BETTER looking card I just got back from PSA. Same background color and everything.....notice the grade they gave it...



This card looks AWESOME to the naked eye. Even when you tip it in the light, you can see the gloss on the card (You usually can't see gloss on a 1955 card).....

Last edited by bobbyw8469; 07-31-2013 at 08:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2013, 09:46 PM
conor912's Avatar
conor912 conor912 is offline
C0nor D0na.hue
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
No way in hell is that card an '8'. Save your money.
Agreed. I'd say a 6, maybe 6.5 on a good day. Not worth the fees.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2013, 05:48 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is online now
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,038
Default

I am thinking '4' or '4.5'. Definitely keep it raw!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2013, 04:04 PM
auggiedoggy's Avatar
auggiedoggy auggiedoggy is offline
Rob Ruddy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by conor912 View Post
Agreed. I'd say a 6, maybe 6.5 on a good day. Not worth the fees.
Agreed! Pretty realistic assessment.
__________________
Successful transactions with the-illini, Kawika, irishdenny, iwantitiwinit, AddieJoss.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-03-2013, 04:36 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is online now
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,038
Default

No way does that common look better than the Koufax. The Koufax got a '5'. The only way it grades higher than the Koufax is because of it being a common, PSA might be more lenient on the grade. I would like to believe that doesn't happen over there.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: T206 mike powers in high grade, or nice grade with b. Hindu CMIZ5290 Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 06-06-2012 04:07 PM
FSH: '62 Howard, hi-grade '54 Bowman, mid-grade '54 Topps BIN at VCP 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 11-13-2010 10:32 AM
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 24 12-09-2007 07:16 AM
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 08-26-2006 09:05 PM
Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 01-17-2006 05:41 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 PM.


ebay GSB