MIKE TROUT #20 Signed Game-Used Baseball PSA/DNA RookieGraph

[filmmaker]

What are your thoughts? Its at $533 with 4 Days left in the auction.

eBay Item #261267817738


*SUPER RARE* 2009-2010 Mike Trout Signed Game Used Rookie Baseball PSA/DNA # 20
Official Midwest League Baseball and ROOKIE GRAPH PSA!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/261267817738...84.m1438.l2649

<a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/261267817738?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649">eBay MMIKE TROUT Link</a>

[travrosty]

there is probably no way to determine proof positive if that is a game used minor league ball in a game trout was in. so that is a leap of faith. Was psa there at the game?

rookie ball is misleading on the coa, because a rookie graph is only an autograph signed by the player during his rookie season, it's not referring to the equipment it is signed on, but i dont think psa cares. how does psa know it is a rookie ball? that's ridiculous, psa doesnt know anything about that ball, it's a rookie autograph on the ball but to call it a rookie ball is what? I don't know.

thats a lot of dough for someones autograph that you will probably be able to get for a lot less later on down the road. its speculation that he would make the hof so some people gamble and some don't. Whether the signature is worth more because it is on a ball that is attributed to a minor league game but probably can't be proven is a gamble.

[Deertick]

Originally Posted by travrosty

there is probably no way to determine proof positive if that is a game used minor league ball in a game trout was in. so that is a leap of faith. Was psa there at the game?

rookie ball is misleading on the coa, because a rookie graph is only an autograph signed by the player during his rookie season, it's not referring to the equipment it is signed on, but i dont think psa cares. how does psa know it is a rookie ball? that's ridiculous, psa doesnt know anything about that ball, it's a rookie autograph on the ball but to call it a rookie ball is what? I don't know.

thats a lot of dough for someones autograph that you will probably be able to get for a lot less later on down the road. its speculation that he would make the hof so some people gamble and some don't. Whether the signature is worth more because it is on a ball that is attributed to a minor league game but probably can't be proven is a gamble.

Huh. You are OK with it being called a "Rookie Graph", but not OK with it being a called a "Rookie ball". Huh. Surprising since they weren't there for the signing either.
Maybe he signed it last week as a tribute to his rookie year and went old school on the autograph and uni #?
And what are your thoughts on the photo? It seems a little O/C top to bottom? How did that get past you?

[earlywynnfan]

Uh, at worst it's a ball signed by a player in his rookie season. I think that makes it a rookie ball, don't you??

The SELLER is indicating it's a pre-rookie signed baseball. PSA says nothing about it being signed before he made the majors. PSA says nothing about the ball itself! Sorry to interrupt your witch hunt, but PSA has gotten this one exactly right.

Ken

[shelly]

Then the seller is trying to make you think that Psa said it is a game used ball.
The autograph might be good but the title is fake.

[shelly]

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan

Uh, at worst it's a ball signed by a player in his rookie season. I think that makes it a rookie ball, don't you??

The SELLER is indicating it's a pre-rookie signed baseball. PSA says nothing about it being signed before he made the majors. PSA says nothing about the ball itself! Sorry to interrupt your witch hunt, but PSA has gotten this one exactly right.

Ken

Rookie autograph yes then the ball should sell for around 200 look at what the seller says not what psa said.

[HOF Auto Rookies]

That's not even close to an authentic Trout autograph anyway.