PSA/DNA Babe Ruth Original Photo Authentication

[griffon512]

likely type IV. modern print during or after the 80's. not worth the cost of encapsulation.

[Moonshot Moose]

Originally Posted by griffon512

likely type IV. modern print during or after the 80's. not worth the cost of encapsulation.

I agree as well. 100% more of a modern print.

[filmmaker]

So why wasn't this designated a TYPE IV Photo? I submitted it for Authentication and I understand there are 4 Types.

Also, I cannot find this exact image anywhere in my search.

[Schlesinj]

I do not see a stamp. Besides paper etc, that is what they will use in the review.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by filmmaker

So why wasn't this designated a TYPE IV Photo? I submitted it for Authentication and I understand there are 4 Types.

Also, I cannot find this exact image anywhere in my search.

maybe because PSA(pls submit again) wants you to...submit again?

or...because PSA kinda sucks?

[Moonshot Moose]

Originally Posted by filmmaker

So why wasn't this designated a TYPE IV Photo? I submitted it for Authentication and I understand there are 4 Types.

Also, I cannot find this exact image anywhere in my search.

They can't verify it is a Type IV and just not another print.

[EddieP]

PSA states : “Inconclusive/ Can not render an opinion”. The paper doesn’t look period, so it’s not a type I. Since the paper is not period it eliminates Type 3. So they probably can’t tell if it’s a Type 2 or Type 4