 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-15-2023, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
1974 "Wash Nat'L Lea" why were some cards spared from this?
I've never quite understood why some of the San Diego Padres cards were spared from the "Washington Nat'l Lea" variation since the entire set was printed at one time?
Cards #1-387 were victims, but Padres #406-660 weren't except for #599 If it was a sheet issue, why such a clear separation except for the rookie card (Friesleben)? Any input? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wash "like" Trading in sports cards | Aj-hman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-27-2022 09:14 PM |
| Need Help? Wash. Athletic Club "Pat Raedy" | smokelessjoe | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 0 | 09-15-2010 10:21 AM |
Threaded Mode