![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cy
I was watching the Orioles/Mariners game on the tube and a couple of thoughts struck me as I |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: three25hits
Edgar would be in a much better position to be considered had Seattle played him before he was 27! He is a strong percentage play with the 33rd best adjusted OPS in history (through 2003). He DH'ing will count against him big time -- he sure could have used the 2000+ more plate appearances that Seattle wasted... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett
Being a lifelong Mariners fan I would LOVE to see Edgar get into the hall, and I honestly feel like he deserves it. Actually it is amazing that he has done as well as he has, he toiled in the minors for years, finally becoming a regular in 1990 at the ripe age of 27. His stats are similar to many good to borderline HOFers that have been enshrined, but his weak fielding and eventual shift to DH will hinder his chances. I still believe he will eventually get the nod, though it may be wishful thinking. Olerud is another great story, someone should really write a book about that guy. He went to High School in the Seattle area with my older brother and sister, and was on the golf team throughout high school until his senior year hen he finally decided to play baseball. He played well enough to get a scholarship to Wash. State and was an amazing All-American PITCHER. Then he had an a brain anurism, which is why he always wears that goofy hard hat in the field. He eventually caught on with Toronto (while marrying one of my sisters best friends) and then had an AMAZING 1993 season. He was outstanding that year, flirting with .400 for the majority of it. He is still a great ball-player and as consistent as any in the game. Better yet, from everything I have ever heard about him he is a very humble and nice guy, and perhaps the most amazing of all is how good he would be if he wasn't the slowest baseball player of all time. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: hankron
How many Hall of Fame hitters were horrible fielders? Is being an embarassment in the field better than not being a fielder? If being a DH is so bad, why do Hall of Fame voters generally give little significance to fielding ability when picking Hall of Famers? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: halleygator
http://baseballhalloffame.org/hofers_and_honorees/lists/pos&DH.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: three25hits
Molitor played 1174 games as a DH, with no position having a higher game total. However, he played more games in the field (1495) than at DH. If one defines his position as the place with greatest number of games, then its DH. Depends on the definition. Certainly Molitor wasn't primarily a DH. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hall of Fame | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-07-2007 04:02 PM |
NO new Hall of Famers.......... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-28-2003 11:02 AM |
Hall of Fame | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 09-21-2001 07:17 PM |