|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: raymond g.
I am not familiar with 1911 S74 Silks. I cannot find it in the 2008 SCD catalog? I want to find its value, so I can get a fair price upon disposal! Thanks to anyone that can help identify and locate it in 08 SCD. Can this possibly have the wrong I.D. on the Beckett slap? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
1869-1980 section... the front. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
I've never understood why the SCD book has the T- S- E- etc listings at the END of those letters alphabetically -- very counterintuitive. Anyways, look at the end of the S's and you will find the silks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
I'm not sure why you are having a hard time. The card is a 1911 S74 White Silk Fred Clarke that still retains the backing. The #109 Beckett threw on the slab is meaningless. In the 2009 SCD the card lists in top shape for $300. You should expect between $140-275 for the item if the only thing really wrong with it is the crease that almost always is found on these cards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Rhett, one of my more favorite words, counterintuitive... not even the great Net54 spellchecker is ready for it!!! And I agree, that just the letter should appear before that letter and any other combination of letters thereafter. At least that's how to do it alphabetically. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
Ray, I just checked in the Beckett Almanac and they have Fred Clarke listed as #109 in the set because they have the set broken down by teams and then alphabetically within the team. That is how a guy with the last name that starts with a "C" ends up at the end of the checklist. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD?
Posted By: Fred C
Is it my bad memory or am I recalling that the old price guides used to indicate that you would probably have to pay a "small" premium if you were to purchase a silk with a backing. I think the same was true for cards that had the coupons removed. I always laughed at this because even 30+ years ago you knew how difficult it was to find the item with the "little extra" still attached to it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beckett Graded Card Investor | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-10-2007 02:56 PM |
What's wrong with this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-23-2007 08:15 PM |
Beckett Graded card purchase? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-24-2006 09:45 PM |
Do you see anything wrong with this card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-06-2006 12:59 PM |
can anyone tell me what's wrong with this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-18-2005 12:57 AM |