 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who's Your Vote | |||
| Barry Bonds |
   
|
56 | 34.36% |
| Craig Biggio |
  
|
103 | 63.19% |
| Sammy Sosa |
  
|
13 | 7.98% |
| Mark McGwire |
  
|
25 | 15.34% |
| Roger Clemens |
  
|
52 | 31.90% |
| Curt Schilling |
  
|
31 | 19.02% |
| Mike Piazza |
|
95 | 58.28% |
| Jeff Bagwell |
|
37 | 22.70% |
| Edgar Martinez |
|
30 | 18.40% |
| Lee Smith |
|
34 | 20.86% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-10-2013, 09:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I would not vote for anybody on this list. Of the 1st timers, only Bonds & Clemens are worthy of that extra distinction of being voted in on the 1st time.
But as a punishment for the fact they did use something, they do not get my vote until year 2. As for the non 1st timers, I do not think they are worthy to be Hall of Famers. For that matter, many people already inducted in are not worthy in my opinion. As for next year, I would vote Bonds, Clemens, & Maddux. I don't think Glavine and Thomas are hall of famers. I would make 1 write in canditate vote however for this year....Pete Rose
__________________
Looking for affordable T205 Hoblitzell no stats; also any T206 Drum 
|
|
#2
01-10-2013, 09:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maddux - best of era
Greg Maddux was a monster pitcher. Great in any era, and especially great in his era considering the PHD users he made look silly. Down the road, historians will look at Maddux and start ranking him up there with the very best of all time. Not flashy, not big, not strong, just lethally effective.
|
|
#3
01-10-2013, 10:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/themessage94/ Always up for a trade. If you have a Blue Weiser Wonder WaJo, PM/Email Me!
|
|
#4
01-10-2013, 11:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Two words. Albert Belle.
|
|
#6
01-10-2013, 11:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm still ticked about Will Clark, but I supose it's about time I get over that.
 I'm pulling for Jack Morris, who wasn't listed. On this list, perhaps Biggio, Bagwell, Piazza, and maybe Schilling. I had hoped Murphy would get in since he was a good player who conducted himself well (this seems to be one of the reasons Larkin got in other than his fielding).
__________________
T206 518/518
|
|
#8
01-10-2013, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
It blows my mind that Bagwell continues to get a lot of votes and McGriff doesn't finish ahead of him. Bagwell would only get in as a home run guy, right? Well, he never once led the league in home runs, or any other offensive category except runs.
McGriff led the league in home runs twice and hit more of them. Why would he finish so far behind Bagwell when he was the superior player?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I need your vote!!! | theantiquetiger | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 07-20-2010 12:06 PM |
| Vote!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 482 | 11-09-2008 04:05 PM |
| Now you can vote on #755 too | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-20-2007 09:41 AM |
| HOF vote in | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 01-12-2006 12:43 AM |
| Can we vote? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-07-2004 12:16 AM |
Hybrid Mode
