![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
help from the E-card experts, please : |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
Hi Tim; |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
maybe it's a skinned T208 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Does the E104-1s come with World Champions on top and the 1910 date to the right? I am ignorant about the issue. Dan. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
Some cards have the overprint "1910" and "World Champions" above the head or to the right of the body, etc. Just depends on the player. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
actually that's a good and obvious point. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Colt McClelland
All 18 of the E104-1 cards can be found with and without the overprint, see this site for examples with overprint: |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
i stand corrected. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
According to Pete C's site, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Colt McClelland
How is it known that the blank back E104's are in fact Nadja's? It seems logical that they could have been either an "anonymous" set similar to E98's or perhaps just as easily a blank back version of D359 or T208. Anyone know the history on this? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
Colt. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
it's too confusing...these cards should all be avoided at all cost. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
about the Library of Congress website: |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Tbob makes an excellent point. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
To "murcerfan" or anyone else: No, don't avoid items that are questionable, just place common sense over $$$ and you'll be fine. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Mosley
Hey Pete, |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
I'm pretty certain that murcerfan was kidding when he recommended that they be avoided at all cost. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Pete. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
maybe Williams Baking realized that they pulled a Dan Quayle on the "Potatoe" spelling and decided to eliminate the back advertising after the first print run... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Mosley
Not a bad explanation... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
maybe them taters made the bread really lousy...I know I've never really been too big on heavy bread..although one might not guess that at first glance |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calling All W517 Experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 09-29-2012 12:41 PM |
Calling On T207 Experts for Help! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-01-2008 06:39 PM |
OT: Calling All Autograph Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-11-2006 09:05 PM |
Calling W517 Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-29-2005 08:06 PM |
Calling all Exhibit experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-09-2005 04:29 PM |