The cards have a certain warmth, unlike newer cards which have a brighter, crisper image. No criticism intended by the comparison.
As I mentioned the set for the most part offers beautiful photography, but there are certain numbers that didn't benefit from the process. It's hard to discern the facial features of Hector Rodriguez, #98, and the Lown, Surkont, Lollar, and Fox all appear to be a bit murky. Lie many previous sets quality control leaves something to be desired for this set- too many off-center and miscut cards to begin with. I've also wondered why there are two cards of Al Corwin in the set.
Are there any certain cards that collectors would like to point out for their artistry?
|