|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello all,
I recently sent cards into SGC for grading, as I hope to sell all my cards to pay for my photography gear. I used SGC for two reasons, first, it doesn’t require a subscription and second, I always read they are better with vintage cards. Before sending them in, I carefully examined each card and compared them with others I found online. I estimate the condition score conservatively and what I got back left me flabbergasted. I know, I know, it’s common for collectors to not get what they were expecting. That’s happened to me with PSA in the past, but with them they were consistent with everything I had sent in. With SGC, the grading was like a Rob Dibble fast ball...all over the place. Cards I thought for sure that were 7s got 5s and cards that should have gotten 4s got 6s. Has anyone else had this issue with SGC? Do I have any recourse? Does the same grader do the entire order? Any advice would help. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grading 50's & 60's | blackandgold | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-09-2014 05:40 PM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 01:52 PM |
| 1948 Leaf Printing Inconsistencies? | poorlydrawncat | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 04-12-2013 04:03 PM |
| Size inconsistencies of 1960 Fleer Baseball Greats | Daniel | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 06-01-2011 01:48 PM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 10:11 AM |