SGC grading inconsistencies

jayshum · #1 02-23-2020, 10:11 AM

I'm confused. You say you wanted a 7 minimum for the Morgan, but the picture you posted shows it in an 8 slab, or am I missing something?

irv · #2 02-23-2020, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayshum

I'm confused. You say you wanted a 7 minimum for the Morgan, but the picture you posted shows it in an 8 slab, or am I missing something?

I'm curious as well with that one, plus I don't understand the "red" in the lable?

I can see what you mean, however, with the 2 T-206 cards. That 3 looks like it is well graded compared to the 2.5 of the other one?

Scans don't always show creases nor paper loss/pin holes very well sometimes so I am guessing something like that is the case?

I've never sent a card in to be graded, but in my time here, I've concluded SGC is the most consistent of the bunch. That's not saying they are perfect, however.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Grading 50's & 60's	blackandgold	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	3	10-09-2014 05:40 PM
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading	scooter729	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	9	08-20-2014 01:52 PM
1948 Leaf Printing Inconsistencies?	poorlydrawncat	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	13	04-12-2013 04:03 PM
Size inconsistencies of 1960 Fleer Baseball Greats	Daniel	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	6	06-01-2011 01:48 PM
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints?	brianp-beme	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	10-30-2010 10:11 AM