|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
 | |||||||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Whether Lifted Gloss Equals Paper Loss and How it Affects PSA grade for you.  Wanted to get a second opinion about whether the missing gloss in the top right white border constitututes paper loss to you? How would it affect your appraisal of a card in terms of PSA (or SGC) grade? How would it affect your personal appraisal of the card, dollar-wise and feels-wise? What about if the card was already graded Altered? Thanks for your thoughts! | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I would believe that is an indicator of a rebuilt corner.
		 
				__________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			vintage dried out tape removal? I dont know how PSA would grade this I would guess paper loss. Larry 
				__________________ Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Unfortunately, the answer is contingent upon who is submitting the card. In this case, I would lean more towards tape removal (or perhaps the result of using a mounting corner) than a completely rebuilt corner. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Take it into a dark room and shine a UV light over it.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Depends on whom submits the card>>>>that's the bottom line
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Looks more than lifted gloss.  Looks as if the first layer of the stock is removed.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 I haven't seen the card in person but I'm trying to nail down a fair price range for a card that already has a confirmed trimmed edge. The discussion is, how would this card otherwise grade if it hadn't been trimmed - like how does it show? The subtract from there since it's also altered. Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 01:25 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Ugh... everyone is still so hung up on a number grade.  It's really quite meaningless to assign a number to this.   I guess if you were to pretend it's not altered, then maybe a 3 at best. If the tape (or whatever it was) took off more than just the glaze, and it lost the very top layer of paper, then a 2 at best. But either way it's an "A" so what does it really matter? | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I know you're showing the area 'missing' the gloss, but the picture makes it confusing, as it looks like there is paper loss there. Can you post a picture where we can see what the card 'really' looks like overall? In other words, not in a way/angle intended to show a lack of gloss in a specific area, but what the card actually looks like in hand?
		 
				__________________ All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel: Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.  | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 Last edited by Johnny630; 01-14-2020 at 05:41 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 05:53 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Quote: 
 Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 06:09 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 I don’t begrudge anyone for wanting to make money/profit on their cards. I, just replying to why I believe people are hung up on the number grade. . | 
| 
			 
			#15  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Since the card is also trimmed, WTF does it matter what a hypothetical number grade would be?  That's the part I take issue with.   The card is an "A" regardless... case closed. The only real reason (IMO) that someone would care about a hypothetical number is for the prospect of buying it, and later trying to re-grade or pass it off as a numerically graded card. And if this is really what the TPGs have "done right" (according to the OP), it might take an eternity to dig into everything they've done wrong. | 
| 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Also, way to twist my point about the utility of a numerical grading system in theory into a defense of how the TPGs actually behave on the hobby. I will say, I'm not sure I see this level of paranoia as helping to make this hobby any better than Mastro and company. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| How does a card w/ paper loss grade a 4? | vintagehofrookies | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 07-06-2014 07:25 PM | 
| Did SGC miss the paper loss? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-20-2012 11:28 PM | 
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM | 
| Loss of Gloss on Worch Cigar PCs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-22-2009 11:54 PM | 
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |