|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think they should relabel the card (I would think it's obvious the card should be labeled accurately), but that it wouldn't be a financial issue for PSA as the card will likely retain it's value (though that's a question to be tested).
The card is unique, so 8 to AUTH valuation change (or lack thereof) on that exception-to-the-rule isn't a general test. Last edited by drcy; 07-10-2019 at 12:45 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interesting T206 Heinie Wagner with missing team name | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-15-2016 01:48 PM |
| 1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 05:30 PM |
| Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 08:22 PM |
| Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 04:32 AM |
| T206 Honus Wagner PSA 9!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-22-2007 08:18 AM |