|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
You may be right about that. So back then a trimmed card couldn't be slabbed, it would have had to been rejected. Interesting dilemma.
Last edited by barrysloate; 07-10-2019 at 07:22 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
They should have started their grading at a grade of TRIMMED and then go from there. Wouldn't that have been the correct way to do it?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-10-2019 at 07:24 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
In The Card, if I recall right, Bill Hughes said there was a consensus that they had to grade it given the context as the card being used to launch the business.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Perhaps the Wagner could have been labeled "NR MT/MT Details." |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interesting T206 Heinie Wagner with missing team name | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-15-2016 01:48 PM |
| 1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 05:30 PM |
| Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 08:22 PM |
| Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 04:32 AM |
| T206 Honus Wagner PSA 9!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-22-2007 08:18 AM |