|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ones from those years that would be worth grading are normally the Hall of Fame rookie cards (plus a couple of extras) like Mattingly. Expect that if they look perfect to you, they might grade anywhere from PSA 7-10. Most modern cards are only worth grading if they attain a grade of PSA 10. Centering is an issue, so is scratching, so is foil and holograms. Corners are not the only factor. PSA has a page on their website where you can learn about what defects reduce the grade of a card.
Feel free to scan some in (like the 1983 RCs of Boggs, Gwynn, and Sandberg) and we can tell you if it makes monetary sense to pay for grading. Look through the sets for some of the valuable errors/variations (1990 Frank Thomas no name on front, 1991 Topps Oil Can Boyd full ribbon, etc). $10 was a heck of a deal for a complete 1992 Topps Gold set.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Set collection advice please | Mike Roche | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 02-14-2016 08:24 PM |
| Need a bit of advice on a small collection | steve B | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 08-25-2014 11:24 AM |
| Have no idea where to go with my collection. Could use your help and advice! | arott23 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 08-15-2014 05:21 PM |
| Needing an e93 Printing variation/blank-back/goof/oddity for my collection | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-30-2014 10:00 PM |
| Any advice on putting a collection together. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-19-2007 09:32 PM |