|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
What's needed is handling it in a slightly different way.
Philatelic foundation is mostly about authentication, but have decided to do some grading. If you send in an item that you think is expensive and as is usual it turns out to be a common version, they charge for the common verson, usually their minimum I think $35. But they issue a certificate identifying it for what it is. And if it's altered... it gets a big "Warning this is altered or faked" rubber stamp in red (Maybe a different printed form? I never checked mine all that closely.) And the problem is clearly described. PSA could easily do the same. For example, I send in a Dover reprint with the perforations shaved off. No more ?auth, which reads like an "I don't know" opening the door to sketchy sales. They charge the base fee, (Or maybe even keep it at the higher fee) And slab it as "Dover reprint -Trimmed" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CSG Grading - Is It a Real Option Yet? | Dead-Ball-Hitter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 01-29-2022 12:37 PM |
| 1951 Bowman Mantle real or not real | marvymelvin | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 06-21-2014 09:47 PM |
| Question about PSA/JSA "Guarantees" | cjedmonton | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 53 | 07-13-2012 09:43 AM |
| Autographed Cobb Card -- Real or Not Real? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 10-21-2008 03:26 PM |
| reflections on on-site grading (not real impressed w/it) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-12-2003 08:05 AM |