 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
12-04-2013, 06:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
There is some culpability on the part of both parties, but the onus falls largely on the auction house. Sure, David could have called and asked some questions, but he shouldn't have had to. The description, along with the scans, should provide all the information a bidder needs to bid confidently. Could you imagine if every bidder had to call to ask for a better description of lots? It would be a fiasco.
One of my hobby pet peeves (I have many) is the way auction lots are written up. I have never seen worse writing in my life than lot descriptions. Hundreds of useless hyberbolic words, numerous convoluted and hard to follow sentences, when a simple "SGC 10 with pinholes" would tell the bidder pretty much everything he needs to know. But writers of auction text gobbledygook have perfected the art of obfuscating any information that would adversely affect bidding. I hate the wordiness of these catalogs and I'm sure many others do too. Just write short, clear, and precise descriptions and move on. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-13-2012 12:02 PM |
| Legendary Auctions - Problem last night | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-18-2010 06:24 PM |
| Problem with SCD | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2010 06:08 AM |
| Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 03-15-2010 07:38 PM |
| SGC Problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2008 06:59 AM |
Threaded Mode